From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f182.google.com ([209.85.192.182]:35364 "EHLO mail-pd0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751396AbbFYIYU (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2015 04:24:20 -0400 Received: by pdbci14 with SMTP id ci14so48679215pdb.2 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 01:24:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <558BBA95.7020402@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:53:49 +0530 From: Varka Bhadram MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH bluetooth-next] mac802154: rename seq to sequence_number References: <1435213871-2450-1-git-send-email-varkab@cdac.in> <558BADCC.6000800@osg.samsung.com> <0521e88599aeca4af403568c9739d33e.squirrel@webmail.itwm.fhg.de> In-Reply-To: <0521e88599aeca4af403568c9739d33e.squirrel@webmail.itwm.fhg.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wpan-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: phoebe.buckheister@itwm.fraunhofer.de, Stefan Schmidt Cc: linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, alex.aring@gmail.com, Varka Bhadram Hi Phoebe Buckheister, On 06/25/2015 01:13 PM, Phoebe Buckheister wrote: > On Thu, June 25, 2015 9:29 am, Stefan Schmidt wrote: >> Hello. >> >> On 25/06/15 08:31, Varka Bhadram wrote: >>> This patch rename ieee802154_hdr member seq to sequence_number. >> Any good reason for this? I think seq is quite clear in this context and >> making it sequence_number has no real benefit. >> >> If others disagree I'm fine to let that one in though. No hard feelings >> about it. > Don't see the in renaming this either. I didn't get your point. ? -- Best regards, Varka Bhadram.