From: Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Marian Marinov <mm@1h.com>
Subject: Re: Lockup in wait_transaction_locked under memory pressure
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:29:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <558C023B.1040204@kyup.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150625115025.GD17237@dhcp22.suse.cz>
I couldn't find any particular OOM which stands out, here how a typical
one looks like:
alxc9 kernel: Memory cgroup out of memory (oom_kill_allocating_task): Kill process 9703 (postmaster) score 0 or sacrifice child
alxc9 kernel: Killed process 9703 (postmaster) total-vm:205800kB, anon-rss:1128kB, file-rss:0kB
alxc9 kernel: php invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd0, order=0, oom_score_adj=0
alxc9 kernel: php cpuset=cXXXX mems_allowed=0-1
alxc9 kernel: CPU: 12 PID: 1000 Comm: php Not tainted 4.0.0-clouder9+ #31
alxc9 kernel: Hardware name: Supermicro X9DRD-7LN4F(-JBOD)/X9DRD-EF/X9DRD-7LN4F, BIOS 3.2 01/16/2015
alxc9 kernel: ffff8805d8440400 ffff88208d863c78 ffffffff815aaca3 ffff8820b947c750
alxc9 kernel: ffff8820b947c750 ffff88208d863cc8 ffffffff81123b2e ffff882000000000
alxc9 kernel: ffffffff000000d0 ffff8805d8440400 ffff8820b947c750 ffff8820b947cee0
alxc9 kernel: Call Trace:
alxc9 kernel: [<ffffffff815aaca3>] dump_stack+0x48/0x5d
alxc9 kernel: [<ffffffff81123b2e>] dump_header+0x8e/0xe0
alxc9 kernel: [<ffffffff81123fa7>] oom_kill_process+0x1d7/0x3c0
alxc9 kernel: [<ffffffff810d85a1>] ? cpuset_mems_allowed_intersects+0x21/0x30
alxc9 kernel: [<ffffffff8118c2bd>] mem_cgroup_out_of_memory+0x2bd/0x370
alxc9 kernel: [<ffffffff81189b37>] ? mem_cgroup_iter+0x177/0x390
alxc9 kernel: [<ffffffff8118c5d7>] mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize+0x267/0x290
alxc9 kernel: [<ffffffff811874f0>] ? mem_cgroup_wait_acct_move+0x140/0x140
alxc9 kernel: [<ffffffff81124504>] pagefault_out_of_memory+0x24/0xe0
alxc9 kernel: [<ffffffff81041927>] mm_fault_error+0x47/0x160
alxc9 kernel: [<ffffffff81041db0>] __do_page_fault+0x340/0x3c0
alxc9 kernel: [<ffffffff81041e6c>] do_page_fault+0x3c/0x90
alxc9 kernel: [<ffffffff815b1758>] page_fault+0x28/0x30
alxc9 kernel: Task in /lxc/cXXXX killed as a result of limit of /lxc/cXXXX
alxc9 kernel: memory: usage 2097152kB, limit 2097152kB, failcnt 7832302
alxc9 kernel: memory+swap: usage 2097152kB, limit 2621440kB, failcnt 0
alxc9 kernel: kmem: usage 0kB, limit 9007199254740988kB, failcnt 0
alxc9 kernel: Memory cgroup stats for /lxc/cXXXX: cache:22708KB rss:2074444KB rss_huge:0KB
mapped_file:19960KB writeback:4KB swap:0KB inactive_anon:20364KB active_anon:2074896KB
inactive_file:1236KB active_file:464KB unevictable:0KB
The backtrace for other processes is exactly the same.
On 06/25/2015 02:50 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 25-06-15 14:43:42, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>> I do have several OOM reports unfortunately I don't think I can
>> correlate them in any sensible way to be able to answer the question
>> "Which was the process that was writing prior to the D state occuring".
>> Maybe you can be more specific as to what am I likely looking for?
>
> Is the system still in this state? If yes I would check the last few OOM
> reports which will tell you the pid of the oom victim and then I would
> check sysrq+t whether they are still alive. And if yes check their stack
> traces to see whether they are still in the allocation path or they got
> stuck somewhere else or maybe they are not related at all...
>
> sysrq+t might be useful even when this is not oom related because it can
> pinpoint the task which is blocking your waiters.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-25 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-25 10:13 Lockup in wait_transaction_locked under memory pressure Nikolay Borisov
2015-06-25 10:16 ` Nikolay Borisov
2015-06-25 11:21 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-25 11:43 ` Nikolay Borisov
2015-06-25 11:50 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-25 12:05 ` Nikolay Borisov
2015-06-25 13:29 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2015-06-25 13:45 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-25 13:54 ` Nikolay Borisov
2015-06-25 13:58 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-25 13:31 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-25 13:49 ` Nikolay Borisov
2015-06-25 14:05 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-25 14:34 ` Nikolay Borisov
2015-06-25 15:18 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-25 15:27 ` Nikolay Borisov
2015-06-29 8:32 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-29 9:07 ` Nikolay Borisov
2015-06-29 9:16 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-29 9:23 ` Nikolay Borisov
2015-06-29 9:38 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-29 10:21 ` Nikolay Borisov
2015-06-29 11:44 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-25 14:45 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-25 13:57 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-29 9:01 ` Nikolay Borisov
2015-06-29 9:36 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-30 1:52 ` Dave Chinner
2015-06-30 3:02 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-30 6:35 ` Nikolay Borisov
2015-06-30 12:30 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-30 14:31 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-30 22:58 ` Dave Chinner
2015-07-01 6:10 ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-01 11:13 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-07-01 14:21 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=558C023B.1040204@kyup.com \
--to=kernel@kyup.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=mm@1h.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.