From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ed White Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] x86/altp2m: add remaining support routines. Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:27:44 -0700 Message-ID: <558C2C00.2010208@intel.com> References: <1434999372-3688-1-git-send-email-edmund.h.white@intel.com> <1434999372-3688-10-git-send-email-edmund.h.white@intel.com> <558AF1B5.4000801@intel.com> <1435222338.28264.313.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1435222338.28264.313.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Ravi Sahita , Wei Liu , Tim Deegan , Ian Jackson , Xen-devel , Jan Beulich , Andrew Cooper , "Lengyel, Tamas" , Daniel De Graaf List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/25/2015 01:52 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 11:06 -0700, Ed White wrote: >> I think we should vote on this. > > In general we vote on things only when there has been a failure to reach > consensus. Unless there has been some prior discussion around this issue > which isn't referenced from the bits of the thread I've looked at then I > don't think we are at that point. I didn't mean vote quite as literally as you seem to have read it. I just meant that IMHO it needs more discussion. I didn't even realize there was a formal procedure for voting -- if I had I would have been more careful with my choice of words. Ed