From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <ivan.ivanov@linaro.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@gmail.com>,
Aisheng Dong <b29396@freescale.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mmc: sdhci: let GPIO based card detection have higher precedence
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:19:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <558D273F.8020108@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435312810-23957-2-git-send-email-ivan.ivanov@linaro.org>
On 26/06/15 13:00, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> Controller could have BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION quirk set, but drivers
> could use GPIO to detect card present state. Let, when defined, GPIO
> take precedence, so drivers could properly detect card state and not
> use polling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <ivan.ivanov@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index bc14452..8bafb9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -1601,15 +1601,18 @@ static int sdhci_do_get_cd(struct sdhci_host *host)
> if (host->flags & SDHCI_DEVICE_DEAD)
> return 0;
>
> + /*
> + * Try slot gpio detect, if defined it take precedence
> + * over build in controller functionality
> + */
> + if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(gpio_cd))
> + return !!gpio_cd;
> +
You've also put it above the MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE check which doesn't seem
right.
> /* If polling/nonremovable, assume that the card is always present. */
> if ((host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION) ||
> (host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE))
> return 1;
>
> - /* Try slot gpio detect */
> - if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(gpio_cd))
> - return !!gpio_cd;
> -
> /* Host native card detect */
> return !!(sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE) & SDHCI_CARD_PRESENT);
> }
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-26 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-26 10:00 [PATCH 0/3] mmc: sdhci: Card detection fixes Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-06-26 10:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] mmc: sdhci: let GPIO based card detection have higher precedence Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-06-26 10:19 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2015-06-26 11:00 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-06-26 11:09 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-06-26 11:12 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-06-26 10:00 ` [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci: don't use card state polling when CD GPIO is defined Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-06-26 10:00 ` [PATCH 3/3] mmc: sdhci: properly check card present state when quirk NO_CARD_NO_RESET is set Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-06-26 10:31 ` [PATCH 0/3] mmc: sdhci: Card detection fixes Jaehoon Chung
2015-06-26 11:05 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=558D273F.8020108@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=b29396@freescale.com \
--cc=ivan.ivanov@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tim.kryger@gmail.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.