From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Ostrovsky Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/nHVM: generic hook adjustments Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 10:58:20 -0400 Message-ID: <558D688C.7040706@oracle.com> References: <558D313C020000780008A126@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Z8V5Q-0008Ld-AS for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 14:58:36 +0000 In-Reply-To: <558D313C020000780008A126@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , xen-devel Cc: Kevin Tian , Keir Fraser , suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, Andrew Cooper , Eddie Dong , Aravind Gopalakrishnan , Jun Nakajima List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/26/2015 05:02 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > > -uint64_t nsvm_vcpu_guestcr3(struct vcpu *v) > -{ > - return vcpu_nestedsvm(v).ns_vmcb_guestcr3; > -} > - If this is removed then I don't see why we still need ns_vmcb_guestcr3, I don't see it being used anywhere except for being assigned a value. -boris