From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Tirumalesh Chalamarla <tchalamarla@caviumnetworks.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: andre.przywara@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rrichter@cavium.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: Enable minimalistic support for Thunder
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:53:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55910794.6000107@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435348284-32132-1-git-send-email-tchalamarla@caviumnetworks.com>
On 26/06/15 20:51, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote:
> In order to allow KVM to run on Thunder implementations, add the
> minimal support required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tirumalesh Chalamarla <tchalamarla@caviumnetworks.com>
CCing the KVM/ARM maintainers should be the first course of action.
Also, you may want to try Suzuki's patch instead:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg117703.html
Constantly adding new CPUs without providing any insight as to how they
should be emulated only brings churn, and not much benefit.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: Enable minimalistic support for Thunder
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:53:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55910794.6000107@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435348284-32132-1-git-send-email-tchalamarla@caviumnetworks.com>
On 26/06/15 20:51, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote:
> In order to allow KVM to run on Thunder implementations, add the
> minimal support required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tirumalesh Chalamarla <tchalamarla@caviumnetworks.com>
CCing the KVM/ARM maintainers should be the first course of action.
Also, you may want to try Suzuki's patch instead:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg117703.html
Constantly adding new CPUs without providing any insight as to how they
should be emulated only brings churn, and not much benefit.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Tirumalesh Chalamarla <tchalamarla@caviumnetworks.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: andre.przywara@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rrichter@cavium.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: Enable minimalistic support for Thunder
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:53:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55910794.6000107@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435348284-32132-1-git-send-email-tchalamarla@caviumnetworks.com>
On 26/06/15 20:51, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote:
> In order to allow KVM to run on Thunder implementations, add the
> minimal support required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tirumalesh Chalamarla <tchalamarla@caviumnetworks.com>
CCing the KVM/ARM maintainers should be the first course of action.
Also, you may want to try Suzuki's patch instead:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg117703.html
Constantly adding new CPUs without providing any insight as to how they
should be emulated only brings churn, and not much benefit.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-29 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-26 19:51 [PATCH] arm64: KVM: Enable minimalistic support for Thunder Tirumalesh Chalamarla
2015-06-26 19:51 ` Tirumalesh Chalamarla
2015-06-26 19:51 ` Tirumalesh Chalamarla
2015-06-29 8:53 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-06-29 8:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-29 8:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-29 17:06 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2015-06-29 17:06 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2015-06-29 17:06 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2015-06-29 17:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-29 17:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-29 17:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-29 17:17 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-29 17:17 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-29 17:17 ` Peter Maydell
2015-07-16 17:40 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2015-07-16 17:40 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2015-07-16 17:40 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55910794.6000107@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@cavium.com \
--cc=tchalamarla@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.