From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752985AbbF2LUE (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2015 07:20:04 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:41845 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752641AbbF2LT7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2015 07:19:59 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,698,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="719526150" Message-ID: <5591293E.80308@intel.com> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:17:18 +0300 From: Adrian Hunter Organization: Intel Finland Oy, Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki, Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4, Domiciled in Helsinki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jiri Olsa , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo CC: Kan Liang , lkml , David Ahern , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH perf/core] perf tools: Add missing break for PERF_RECORD_ITRACE_START References: <1435576340-19346-1-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <1435576340-19346-1-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29/06/15 14:12, Jiri Olsa wrote: > Missing switch break since introduction of new event: > c4937a91ea56 perf tools: handle PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES > > Cc: Kan Liang > Cc: Adrian Hunter > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-e3gbrp2561x2s9tkqvf2wh9n@git.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa > --- > tools/perf/util/machine.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c > index 4744673aff1b..a08e38339cac 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c > @@ -1448,7 +1448,7 @@ int machine__process_event(struct machine *machine, union perf_event *event, > case PERF_RECORD_AUX: > ret = machine__process_aux_event(machine, event); break; > case PERF_RECORD_ITRACE_START: > - ret = machine__process_itrace_start_event(machine, event); > + ret = machine__process_itrace_start_event(machine, event); break; > case PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES: > ret = machine__process_lost_samples_event(machine, event, sample); break; > break; But now you have break; break; Isn't putting 'break' on the end of the line making things harder to read?