From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@redhat.com>
To: lvm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: udev cookie on DM_DEVICE_RELOAD
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 17:01:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55915DB3.7060802@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55915CB6.9070407@suse.de>
On 06/29/2015 04:56 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 06/29/2015 04:49 PM, Peter Rajnoha wrote:
> [ .. ]
>>
>> Actually, we don't check proper combination of dm_task_set_cookie with
>> dm task type. So currently, if someone sets cookie on a task that does
>> not produce uevents, it can hang if dm_udev_wait is called for such cookie.
>>
>> I've noticed we have a FIXME in the code for this already, but clearly
>> nobody has run into this issue yet. I'll add the check!
>>
>> As for the DM_DEVICE_RELOAD - yes, it needs DM_DEVICE_RESUME to be called
>> right after the reload for the new table to be used (and hence the uevent
>> with the cookie generated as well). If you call RELOAD, the inactive
>> table is loaded which is then switched to active with the RESUME.
>>
>> The task that is transparently translated into 3 tasks internally is the
>> DM_DEVICE_CREATE (with table) which translates into CREATE + LOAD + RESUME.
>>
>> Anyway, yes, the check whether cookie is not misused is not there yet, so
>> that's why you hit this.
>>
> So how to circumvent this?
> Should I do an explicit
> SUSPEND/RELOAD/RESUME call sequence and add a cookie on the final
> resume?
> Or is it sufficient to call RESUME after RELOAD without suspending
> first? Or another magic trick?
suspend -> reload -> dm_task_set_cookie -> resume -> dm_udev_wait
should be the proper sequence.
The reload never translates internally into more tasks...
Can you point me to the exact code you're trying to edit?
--
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-29 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-29 13:46 udev cookie on DM_DEVICE_RELOAD Hannes Reinecke
2015-06-29 14:02 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-06-29 14:02 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-06-29 14:49 ` Peter Rajnoha
2015-06-29 14:49 ` Peter Rajnoha
2015-06-29 14:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-06-29 15:01 ` Peter Rajnoha [this message]
2015-06-29 15:10 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2015-06-29 14:45 ` Alasdair G Kergon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55915DB3.7060802@redhat.com \
--to=prajnoha@redhat.com \
--cc=lvm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.