From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [v4][PATCH 04/19] xen/passthrough: extend hypercall
 to support rdm reservation policy
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 16:06:38 +0100
Message-ID: <559401FE.10804@citrix.com>
References: <1435053450-25131-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>
	<1435053450-25131-5-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>
	<CAFLBxZYshUu4NWmVU2yMeoR+-QoidkL2KjuuW3ZtS5hHPe0WSA@mail.gmail.com>
	<55927C78.10301@intel.com> <5592A598.60001@eu.citrix.com>
	<55933E4D.4030405@intel.com> <5593BAAB.20801@eu.citrix.com>
	<5593C544.2030009@intel.com> <5593FB94.50803@eu.citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <5593FB94.50803@eu.citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>, Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>, Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Hi,

On 01/07/15 15:39, George Dunlap wrote:
> Then make the meaning of the flags as follows:
> * for pci devices:
>  - RDM_RELAXED flag SET: ignore conflicts in set_identity_p2m_entry()
>  - RDM_RELAXED flag CLEAR: error on conflicts in set_identity_p2m_entry()
> * for dt devices:
>  - Ignore this flag entirely
> 
> If Julien really wants we could error on RDM_RELAXED being set; but I
> don't think that's necessary.

I was confused when I suggested this. After speaking with George IRL,
I'm fine with his solution.

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall