From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34191)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sw@weilnetz.de>) id 1ZAMJg-0004Qq-La
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 14:01:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sw@weilnetz.de>) id 1ZAMJa-000565-Dy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 14:01:00 -0400
Received: from v220110690675601.yourvserver.net ([37.221.199.173]:39548)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sw@weilnetz.de>) id 1ZAMJa-00053J-8X
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 14:00:54 -0400
Message-ID: <55942AD1.1040906@weilnetz.de>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 20:00:49 +0200
From: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1435148753-4476-1-git-send-email-zavadovsky.yan@gmail.com>
	<CAAkiskgEE+49yi3hib4x_tYscwsPdMJOXPsu1HX_ajrtvEfC4g@mail.gmail.com>
	<55941A03.8040803@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <55941A03.8040803@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] thread-win32: fix GetThreadContext()
	permanently fails
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Zavadovsky Yan <zavadovsky.yan@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Fabien Chouteau <chouteau@adacore.com>
Cc: Olivier Hainque <hainque@adacore.com>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

Am 01.07.2015 um 18:49 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>
> On 01/07/2015 17:48, Zavadovsky Yan wrote:
>> Ping.
> Stefan, are you merging this?
>
> Paolo

I can do so, but as the current code seems to fix the problems
with multi-processor systems, too (even if it is unclear why),
it does not look urgent.

Fabien, you suggested "extensive tests". Do you think that
patch v2 is fine, or are you still waiting for test results?

Stefan