From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lambert.quentin@gmail.com (Quentin Lambert) Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 11:06:20 +0200 Subject: [Cocci] release: 1.0.1: Checking installation dependencies In-Reply-To: References: <55845D5F.6010408@users.sourceforge.net> <55852F40.4000502@users.sourceforge.net> <5588106D.7020305@gmail.com> <558818EE.8000900@users.sourceforge.net> <55892843.7070001@gmail.com> <55892D6D.5000001@users.sourceforge.net> <20150623172811.GU11147@wotan.suse.de> <5593A5BE.7090308@gmail.com> <559402D7.7020203@users.sourceforge.net> <5594E6EE.90202@users.sourceforge.net> <5594F0E0.8090408@users.sourceforge.net> Message-ID: <5594FF0C.7070206@gmail.com> To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr I am very sorry, I must have made a mistake before I have successfully reproduced the bug I am working on fixing it now. On 02/07/2015 10:11, Julia Lawall wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >>> But changing it at this point will not help to find the source >>> of your problem. >> Do we talk about the same meaning for the directory name "lib"? > The issue is the sequence of letters /lib and /lib64, not what they mean. > > julia