From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Elena Ufimtseva <elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [CALL-FOR-AGENDA] Monthly Xen.org Technical Call (2015-07-08)
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 11:27:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559503FB.3010508@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435826737.21469.314.camel@citrix.com>
El 02/07/15 a les 10.45, Ian Campbell ha escrit:
> On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 09:32 +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> El 01/07/15 a les 18.15, Boris Ostrovsky ha escrit:
>>> On 07/01/2015 11:57 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>>> The next Xen technical call will be at:
>>>> Wed 8 Jul 17:00:00 BST 2015
>>>> `date -d @1436371200`
>>>>
>>>> See http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg00414.html
>>>> for more information on the call.
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know (CC-ing the list) any topics which you would like to
>>>> discuss. It might be useful to include:
>>>>
>>>> * References to any relevant/recent mailing list threads;
>>>> * Other people who you think should be involved in the discussion (and
>>>> CC them);
>>>>
>>>> If you would like to attend then please let me know so I can send you the
>>>> dial in details.
>>>
>>>
>>> Given that there is fair amount of PVH-related work happening now
>>> (Roger's, Elena's and mine) perhaps we should have a discussion about
>>> that to see where we are going?
>>>
>>> Andrew, Tim, Roger, Jan (if he is back from vacation), Elena, Konrad and
>>> David would be good to have present.
>
> Yes, I think this topic would indeed be a worthwhile subject for
> discussion.
>
> I think there is a toolstack element to all this as well, so would it be
> a good idea to have Ian J, Stefano and Wei in addition to me (who will
> be there to run the call in any case)? I'd probably mark them in as
> optional participants for scheduling purposes.
Yes, my series include way more toolstack than hypervisor changes.
>> I'm sorry but I will be on vacation next week, hiking in the mountains
>> without Internet or cell phone coverage, so I won't be able to join the
>> meeting.
>
> I think you are one of the critical participants in the discussion, i.e.
> we can't go ahead without you.
>
>> I will be back on the 20th, maybe we can arrange to do another of this
>> PVH meetings on the next technical call in early August?
>
> The August call is scheduled for 12 August, which is 6 weeks from
> yesterday.
>
> We could either go for that or if it is too far out we could push the
> July iteration of the call back two weeks to Wednesday 22 July (so 3
> weeks from yesterday). (a one week slip would still land in your
> vacation time).
I would rather go for the 22 or 29 of July or the 5 of August, because
I'm also on vacations from the 10 to the 16 of August.
> There is also the devsummit in the week 17 August (~7 weeks time) which
> is an opportunity for a f2f.
>
> Shall I put up a poll of some sort to gather preferred timeslot options
> out of that set?
That sounds fine, thanks.
Roger.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-02 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-01 15:57 [CALL-FOR-AGENDA] Monthly Xen.org Technical Call (2015-07-08) Ian Campbell
2015-07-01 16:15 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-01 16:23 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-02 7:32 ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-07-02 8:45 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-02 9:27 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2015-07-02 9:37 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-02 15:16 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-03 12:55 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-06 15:57 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-02 10:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-07-07 12:16 ` Ian Campbell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-07-06 17:11 Elena Ufimtseva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559503FB.3010508@citrix.com \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.