From: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Philippe Gerum : cobalt/thread: generalize usage of -> lock_count for preemption control
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 15:46:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559540CF.8080903@xenomai.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55953E81.7020505@siemens.com>
On 07/02/2015 03:37 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2015-07-02 09:41, git repository hosting wrote:
>> Module: xenomai-3
>> Branch: next
>> Commit: 97e32440e9675ba91cdf80b320a35979b935dd8c
>> URL: http://git.xenomai.org/?p=xenomai-3.git;a=commit;h=97e32440e9675ba91cdf80b320a35979b935dd8c
>>
>> Author: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
>> Date: Tue Jun 30 20:36:25 2015 +0200
>>
>> cobalt/thread: generalize usage of ->lock_count for preemption control
>>
>> XNLOCK is uselessly mirroring only part of the information
>> ->lock_count conveys.
>>
>> We only need to keep XNLOCK as a mode bit in the ABI between the
>> Cobalt core and lib/cobalt for switching the lock from user-space,
>> using ->lock_count internally for testing the current preemption
>> state.
>>
>
> What about the mode listing in /proc/xenomai/sched/threads? I think it
> will not work anymore right now, but likely it's useful to keep this.
Correct, this needs fixing too. I'm working on moving XNLBALERT out of
the way, so that we may stop grabbing the big fat lock over xnlock
entirely, which will be nice to rtdm_lock* services.
> The registry daemon should be fine as it builds on top of the
> user/kernel ABI, right?
>
Same issue than above: we still need to convert a non-zero lock_count to
XNLOCK in the state flags returned to userland.
--
Philippe.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-02 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1ZAZ7w-0003gL-BC@sd-51317.xenomai.org>
2015-07-02 13:37 ` [Xenomai] Philippe Gerum : cobalt/thread: generalize usage of -> lock_count for preemption control Jan Kiszka
2015-07-02 13:46 ` Philippe Gerum [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559540CF.8080903@xenomai.org \
--to=rpm@xenomai.org \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.