From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:51099 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755293AbbGFTo5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2015 15:44:57 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([88.71.42.237]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue002) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0Ly6KL-1Z0Bnf47GP-015WqW for ; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 21:44:55 +0200 Message-ID: <559ADAB5.3050804@friedels.name> Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 21:44:53 +0200 From: Hendrik Friedel MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: size 2.73TiB used 240.97GiB after balance References: <559AD4E5.2030107@friedels.name> In-Reply-To: <559AD4E5.2030107@friedels.name> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, ok, sdc seems to have failed (sorry, I checked only sdd and sdb SMART values, as sdc is brand new. Maybe a bad assumption, from my side. I have mounted the device mount -o recovery,ro So, what should I do now: btrfs device delete /dev/sdc /mnt or mount -o degraded /dev/sdb /mnt btrfs device delete missing /mnt I do have a backup of the most valuable data. But if you consider one of the above options risky, I might better get a new drive before, but this might take a couple of days (in which sdc could further degrade). What is your recommendation? Regards, Hendrik --- Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft. https://www.avast.com/antivirus