From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [v4][PATCH 04/19] xen/passthrough: extend hypercall
 to support rdm reservation policy
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 14:36:47 +0800
Message-ID: <559B737F.9040906@intel.com>
References: <1435053450-25131-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>	<1435053450-25131-5-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>	<CAFLBxZYshUu4NWmVU2yMeoR+-QoidkL2KjuuW3ZtS5hHPe0WSA@mail.gmail.com>	<55927C78.10301@intel.com>	<5592A598.60001@eu.citrix.com>	<55933E4D.4030405@intel.com>	<5593BAAB.20801@eu.citrix.com>	<5593C544.2030009@intel.com>	<5593FB94.50803@eu.citrix.com>
	<5594DF1D.3080803@intel.com> <559A96C6.5050707@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <559A96C6.5050707@intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Just please go to review the new revision directly.

Thanks
Tiejun

On 2015/7/6 22:55, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
>>> * for dt devices:
>>>   - Ignore this flag entirely
>>
>> But we still a flag to assign_device() like this,
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c
>> b/xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c
>> index 5d3842a..a182487 100644
>> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c
>> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c
>> @@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ int iommu_assign_dt_device(struct domain *d, struct
>> dt_device_node *dev)
>>               goto fail;
>>       }
>>
>> -    rc = hd->platform_ops->assign_device(d, 0, dt_to_dev(dev));
>> +    rc = hd->platform_ops->assign_device(d, 0, dt_to_dev(dev),
>> +                                         XEN_DOMCTL_DEV_RDM_RELAXED);
>>
>>       if ( rc )
>>           goto fail;
>>
>> Or rc = hd->platform_ops->assign_device(d, 0, dt_to_dev(dev), 0)?
>>
>
> Any comments to this?
>
> Thanks
> Tiejun
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
>