From: "Yu, Zhang" <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>,
"zhiyuan.lv@intel.com" <zhiyuan.lv@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Resize the MAX_NR_IO_RANGES for ioreq server
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 22:49:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559BE6F6.4020403@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559C01C2020000780008D8EC@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 7/7/2015 10:43 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 07.07.15 at 16:30, <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> I know that George and you have concerns about the differences
>> between MMIO and guest page tables, but I do not quite understand
>> why. :)
>
> But you read George's very nice description of the differences? I
> ask because if you did, I don't see why you re-raise the question
> above.
>
Well, yes. I guess you mean this statement:
"the former is one or two actual ranges of a significant size; the
latter are (apparently) thousands of ranges of one page each."?
But I do not understand why this is abusing the io range interface.
Does the number matters so much? :)
B.R.
Yu
> Jan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-07 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-06 6:25 [PATCH v2 0/2] Refactor ioreq server for better performance Yu Zhang
2015-07-06 6:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Resize the MAX_NR_IO_RANGES for ioreq server Yu Zhang
2015-07-06 12:35 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-06 12:38 ` Paul Durrant
2015-07-06 12:49 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-06 13:09 ` Paul Durrant
2015-07-06 13:23 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-06 13:28 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-06 13:33 ` Paul Durrant
2015-07-06 14:06 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-07 8:16 ` Yu, Zhang
2015-07-07 9:23 ` Paul Durrant
2015-07-07 12:53 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-07 13:11 ` Paul Durrant
2015-07-07 14:04 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-07 14:30 ` Yu, Zhang
2015-07-07 14:43 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-07 14:49 ` Yu, Zhang [this message]
2015-07-07 15:10 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-07 16:02 ` Yu, Zhang
2015-07-07 15:12 ` Paul Durrant
2015-07-07 15:27 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-07 15:29 ` Paul Durrant
2015-07-06 6:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Add new data structure to track ranges Yu Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559BE6F6.4020403@linux.intel.com \
--to=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Paul.Durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=zhiyuan.lv@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.