From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com, jroedel@suse.de,
ogerlitz@mellanox.com, amirv@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: count number of assigned devices
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:36:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559BF203.2010202@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436282525.1391.42.camel@redhat.com>
On 07/07/2015 17:22, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> > -#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_NONCOHERENT_DMA
>> > +#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VFIO_HOOKS
> Do we really want to tie these two things together under something
> that's not strictly a "vfio" option? Legacy assignment also makes use
> of these, as shown in this patch, but even if we consider that temporary
> until legacy assignment is removed, I can imagine platforms that might
> care about one but not the other. I don't really see the harm in using
> a separate #define, perhaps __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_ASSIGNED_DEVICE. Thanks,
Sure, that's okay.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-07 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-07 13:45 [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: x86: full virtualization of guest MTRR Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-07 13:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: count number of assigned devices Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-07 15:22 ` Alex Williamson
2015-07-07 15:36 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-07-07 13:45 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: SVM: use NPT page attributes Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-08 5:59 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-07-08 11:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-09 2:30 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-07-09 15:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-10 1:19 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-07-10 10:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-10 16:02 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-07-17 0:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-17 2:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-07 13:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: SVM: Sync g_pat with guest-written PAT value Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-07 13:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86: apply guest MTRR virtualization on host reserved pages Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-07 14:06 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: x86: full virtualization of guest MTRR Joerg Roedel
2015-07-07 14:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-07 14:14 ` Joerg Roedel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-07-08 15:18 [RFC/RFT PATCH v3 " Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-08 15:18 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: count number of assigned devices Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-08 15:29 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559BF203.2010202@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=amirv@mellanox.com \
--cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.