Re: RFC: drop glamor from nouveau ddx

[poma <pomidorabelisima-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

On 07.07.2015 23:05, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On 8 July 2015 at 06:06, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>> Ben,
>>
>> Looks like the reality is that glamor is just not hooked up properly
>> in the nouveau DDX. Mainly it's missing DRI2, which in turn means no
>> core GL contexts, and probably lots of other issues. While this could
>> probably be fixed somehow, I doubt there's any advantage to using the
>> nouveau DDX over something like modesetting nowadays.
>>
>> How would you feel about dropping glamor support from the nouveau ddx
>> and failing to load for GPUs that don't have EXA support (unless
>> AccelMode = none is forced for them). That way it'll fall back to
>> loading modesetting which should be properly set up for DRI2 and so
>> on.
> I have no objections to this.  In fact, in Fedora at least (I floated
> the idea in #nouveau a while back too), in the near future I plan on
> having the DDX fail to load on all GPUs where modesetting+glamor can
> be used (unless overridden by a config option).
> 

Shouldn't the priority always be what is proven to work.
NV50 works OK with the EXA.
Besides, can it be set "color vibrance", "vibrant hue" and other props via "modeset"?

When people get hit by sunstroke, a real summer has begun.

_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau