From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 11/12] eal: Consolidate
 pci_map/unmap_device() of linuxapp and bsdapp
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:50:07 +0900
Message-ID: <559CE43F.1080701@igel.co.jp>
References: <1435652668-3380-12-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp>
 <CALwxeUse35k41OfLg+rX3CYcOT9guNv+mYgEBrkm=jC-=BKxnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <559C8E32.3070808@igel.co.jp> <1698963.eCjHRZebdj@xps13>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-pd0-f173.google.com (mail-pd0-f173.google.com
 [209.85.192.173]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F682A5E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  8 Jul 2015 10:50:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by pdbep18 with SMTP id ep18so142056031pdb.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 01:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1698963.eCjHRZebdj@xps13>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 2015/07/08 17:27, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-07-08 11:42, Tetsuya Mukawa:
>> On 2015/07/07 17:06, David Marchand wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp
>>>     +       /* FreeBSD has only one pass through driver */
>>>     +       dev->kdrv = RTE_KDRV_NIC_UIO;
>>>     +
>>>
>>> Do we need a new define for this ?
>>>
>>> I know this is not really part of this patchset, but this kdrv should
>>> just disappear.
>> Do you mean kdrv member will disappear in next DPDK release?
> No, it is not (yet) planned to be removed.
> But David thinks it shouldn't be part of the public API.
> So, as David said, this comment is not really related to your patch.
> It may be addressed separately.
> Please Tetsuya, go ahead with the v9.
> Thanks

Thanks, I've got it.

Tetsuya