All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: jdenemar@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, afaerber@suse.de
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH rebased for-2.4] target-i386: add ABM to Haswell* and Broadwell* CPU models
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 14:10:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <559D1342.7000608@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150707172151.GE32472@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>



On 07/07/2015 19:21, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 12:42:01PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> ABM is only implemented as a single instruction set by AMD; all AMD
>> processors support both instructions or neither. Intel considers POPCNT
>> as part of SSE4.2, and LZCNT as part of BMI1, but Intel also uses AMD's
>> ABM flag to indicate support for both POPCNT and LZCNT.  It has to be
>> added to Haswell and Broadwell because Haswell, by adding LZCNT, has
>> completed the ABM.
>>
>> Tested with "qemu-kvm -cpu Haswell-noTSX,enforce" (and also with older
>> machine types) on an Haswell-EP machine.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  hw/i386/pc_piix.c | 4 ++++
>>  hw/i386/pc_q35.c  | 4 ++++
>>  target-i386/cpu.c | 8 ++++----
>>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
>> index 56cdcb9..d9e9987 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
>> +++ b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
>> @@ -312,6 +312,10 @@ static void pc_compat_2_3(MachineState *machine)
>>      if (kvm_enabled()) {
>>          pcms->smm = ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF;
>>      }
>> +    x86_cpu_compat_set_features("Haswell", FEAT_8000_0001_ECX, 0, CPUID_EXT3_ABM);
>> +    x86_cpu_compat_set_features("Haswell-noTSX", FEAT_8000_0001_ECX, 0, CPUID_EXT3_ABM);
>> +    x86_cpu_compat_set_features("Broadwell", FEAT_8000_0001_ECX, 0, CPUID_EXT3_ABM);
>> +    x86_cpu_compat_set_features("Broadwell-noTSX", FEAT_8000_0001_ECX, 0, CPUID_EXT3_ABM);
> 
> x86_cpu_compat_set_features() is not necessary anymore, please use
> PC_COMPAT_2_3 to disable ABM.

Would this be appropriate for 2.4, or should I just wait for 2.5?

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-08 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-07 10:42 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH rebased for-2.4] target-i386: add ABM to Haswell* and Broadwell* CPU models Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-07 17:21 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-07-08 12:10   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-07-08 14:29     ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-07-28 18:51 ` Eduardo Habkost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=559D1342.7000608@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=jdenemar@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.