From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] xen/vm_event: Deny register writes
 if refused by vm_event reply
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 15:52:13 +0300
Message-ID: <559D1CFD.40108@bitdefender.com>
References: <1436350970-4987-1-git-send-email-rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>
	<1436350970-4987-4-git-send-email-rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>
	<CAD33N+71-ha+8hz8EkS=F9dRotvG8hMpcx9c1=M3E3eVPxCLVA@mail.gmail.com>
	<559D16DB.5090403@bitdefender.com>
	<CAD33N+5B=D0uBMFJAA6mPWvjrsQnGGJstoaDk=wfSdy1_M-MGA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAD33N+5B=D0uBMFJAA6mPWvjrsQnGGJstoaDk=wfSdy1_M-MGA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: "Lengyel, Tamas" <tlengyel@novetta.com>
Cc: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, kevin.tian@intel.com, keir@xen.org, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, eddie.dong@intel.com, Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 07/08/2015 03:39 PM, Lengyel, Tamas wrote:
> 
> 
>     Are the license headers required? I just tried to make the change as
>     small as possible, and looking at the other headers (for example in
>     xen/include/asm-arm), at least half of them have no license header. I'm
>     guessing this is something we'd now like to start correcting in new
>     patches?
> 
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Razvan
> 
> 
> The wiki's definition that goes with the Signed-off-by tag goes: "The
> contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I have the right
> to submit it under the open source license indicated in the file;". So,
> the open source license should be indicated in the file. If it's a new
> file being created, I would say it's the creators responsibility to add
> the license. But I haven't seen any discussion/documentation on the
> matter so I'm just guessing.

That makes sense, thanks for pointing it out. I'm happy to resubmit with
the license header if it is required. I'm also obviously OK with the
license header you've provided, so if this series does land first and
you don't mind, feel free to add the original license text to the files.

Not a problem either way.


Thanks,
Razvan