Re: Intel Baytrail Linux Audio

[Tyler Yeomans <tyeo098@gmail.com>]

Antonio,

Hmm...
I have been running the driver like so:
(from sound/soc/intel/common/sst-acpi.c)
static struct sst_acpi_desc sst_acpi_baytrail_desc = {
     .drv_name = "baytrail-pcm-audio",
     .machines = baytrail_machines,
     .resindex_lpe_base = 0,
     .resindex_pcicfg_base = 1,
     .resindex_fw_base = 2,
*    .irqindex_host_ipc = 0,*
     .sst_id = SST_DEV_ID_BYT,
     .resindex_dma_base = -1,
};

Which is what the patch at 
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=155341 says to do.

However I also noticed in this file that its looking for the wrong 
firmware:
static struct sst_acpi_mach baytrail_machines[] = {
*{ "10EC5640", "byt-rt5640", "intel/fw_sst_0f28.bin-48kHz_i2s_master" },*
     { "193C9890", "byt-max98090", 
"intel/fw_sst_0f28.bin-48kHz_i2s_master" },
     {}
};

Which will not point to the SSP0 firmware uploaded by Vinod.

Thanks-

Tyler

On 07/08/2015 12:21 PM, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 10:30:41 -0400
> Tyler Yeomans <tyeo098@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>> Additionally, you were correct about the sorting of interrupts, as my
>> dissembled DSDT table shows:
>> (from Device(LPEA) section)
>>         Interrupt (ResourceConsumer, Level, ActiveLow, Exclusive, ,, )
>>                   {
>>                       0x0000001D,
>>                   }
> [...]
>> For now I can research into overriding the DSDT so the interrupts are in
>> order.
> You can follow Documentation/acpi/dsdt-override.txt, but maybe patching
> the driver is faster for a quick test; just remember to revert the
> driver change if you reorder the interrupts in the DSDT later on :)
>
> Ciao,
>     Antonio
>