From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tyler Yeomans <tyeo098@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Intel Baytrail Linux Audio
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 12:32:17 -0400
Message-ID: <559D5091.9020802@gmail.com>
References: <8D3F6266AEB6384E807C6FFC6FE195E30B49AE39@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com>	<20150703143608.7afb34c985d82982e929484e@ao2.it>	<20150703130658.GA1689228@phare.normalesup.org>	<559A90CE.2030105@gmail.com>	<20150707031950.GD11002@localhost>	<559BDB7F.9010105@gmail.com>	<20150707170821.GL11002@localhost>	<559C3F4A.5030307@gmail.com>	<20150708033604.GM11002@localhost>	<20150708102308.91b7258f243e354b1365a47e@ao2.it>	<559D3411.6060306@gmail.com>
 <20150708182132.db38656fb4ccc2e38e41aba0@ao2.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from mail-qg0-f51.google.com (mail-qg0-f51.google.com
 [209.85.192.51])
 by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99449264F09
 for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Wed,  8 Jul 2015 18:32:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by qgef3 with SMTP id f3so52605724qge.0
 for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 09:32:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150708182132.db38656fb4ccc2e38e41aba0@ao2.it>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/options/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: Antonio Ospite <ao2@ao2.it>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>, "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, Nicolas George <george@nsup.org>, "Girdwood,
 Liam R" <liam.r.girdwood@intel.com>, "Nikula,
 Jarkko" <jarkko.nikula@intel.com>
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

Antonio,

Hmm...
I have been running the driver like so:
(from sound/soc/intel/common/sst-acpi.c)
static struct sst_acpi_desc sst_acpi_baytrail_desc = {
     .drv_name = "baytrail-pcm-audio",
     .machines = baytrail_machines,
     .resindex_lpe_base = 0,
     .resindex_pcicfg_base = 1,
     .resindex_fw_base = 2,
*    .irqindex_host_ipc = 0,*
     .sst_id = SST_DEV_ID_BYT,
     .resindex_dma_base = -1,
};

Which is what the patch at 
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=155341 says to do.

However I also noticed in this file that its looking for the wrong 
firmware:
static struct sst_acpi_mach baytrail_machines[] = {
*{ "10EC5640", "byt-rt5640", "intel/fw_sst_0f28.bin-48kHz_i2s_master" },*
     { "193C9890", "byt-max98090", 
"intel/fw_sst_0f28.bin-48kHz_i2s_master" },
     {}
};

Which will not point to the SSP0 firmware uploaded by Vinod.

Thanks-

Tyler

On 07/08/2015 12:21 PM, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 10:30:41 -0400
> Tyler Yeomans <tyeo098@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>> Additionally, you were correct about the sorting of interrupts, as my
>> dissembled DSDT table shows:
>> (from Device(LPEA) section)
>>         Interrupt (ResourceConsumer, Level, ActiveLow, Exclusive, ,, )
>>                   {
>>                       0x0000001D,
>>                   }
> [...]
>> For now I can research into overriding the DSDT so the interrupts are in
>> order.
> You can follow Documentation/acpi/dsdt-override.txt, but maybe patching
> the driver is faster for a quick test; just remember to revert the
> driver change if you reorder the interrupts in the DSDT later on :)
>
> Ciao,
>     Antonio
>