From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: preparing firefly v0.80.11 Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 19:49:35 +0200 Message-ID: <559D62AF.6090107@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Iu6f2rovc8TT3AsoAiBCbpCgIDROfhw3B" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:46832 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758785AbbGHRth (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2015 13:49:37 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Nathan Cutler Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Iu6f2rovc8TT3AsoAiBCbpCgIDROfhw3B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Nathan, You were right : there has been a few issues merging all pull requests in= to the firefly integration branch. But not that much : four pull requests= were set aside because they conflict with each other and mark as DNM.=20 I've pushed the rest in the firefly-backports integration branch and upda= ted http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11644#teuthology-run-commit4f3faaa1faf= 5f3b7fe8c7c9050eeed808d0e787c-firefly-backports-july-2015 accordingly. Let me know if you need anything from me to move forward. I suppose the n= ext step will be to schedule a teuthology run, right ? Cheers --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --Iu6f2rovc8TT3AsoAiBCbpCgIDROfhw3B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlWdYq8ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F20+0QCgs1ltcnvdsM3P5W2qn7Eo3JwO f9oAnRsuFp6v8KUTe4UVJi/Rl2G2f1Yz =MCK7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Iu6f2rovc8TT3AsoAiBCbpCgIDROfhw3B--