From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 3D29AE00978; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 10:58:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (picmaster[at]mail.bg) * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [193.201.172.118 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mx2.mail.bg (mx2.mail.bg [193.201.172.118]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FC9E0095D for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 10:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.62] (unknown [93.152.143.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1B7560075C1; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 20:58:13 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mail.bg; s=default; t=1436378294; bh=OxWm4Jxi+pJIHvnXONsRQC1jxTIFXaZkP8QU1cuq/u8=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=OBTw+cfVUz/QTd6+GEwEesS2T2EvmWUQ9UQ75rHQX7ooEtanQl1jr+4pxTIwnK+l5 HCUFgroIkMFAeOBwBnD+VUvUwPlIffD6bF0rR3pEWePsZoNdij1LCHkqNeNHBy/b4I K7Kv/Vc4hB/i0y8Pb0ufZGmr6eTTEcOrJHIQf0MI= Message-ID: <559D64B5.5070802@mail.bg> Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 20:58:13 +0300 From: Nikolay Dimitrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ann Thornton , Daiane Angolini References: <1436209456-28900-1-git-send-email-ra43240@freescale.com> <559AE65B.6040201@mail.bg> <559AEA1E.8000202@freescale.com> <559BEC6C.80407@mail.bg> <559D34D1.5040203@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <559D34D1.5040203@freescale.com> Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH v2] imx-base.inc mxs-base.inc: Add imx MACHINEOVERRIDES X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:58:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Ann, Daiane, Otavio, On 07/08/2015 05:33 PM, Ann Thornton wrote: > > It is true that mx6 can be used today but soon there will be mx7 and mx8 > and the list will get longer. Also qoriq and automotive will be added > in which we will want to exclude from i.mx. There are recipes, images, > and packagegroups that currently don't need to check for the machine > that will need to coming up and bbappends that will be needed to > differentiate between machines. imx would be a convenience that will be > useful in the near future. The alternative is a long list of i.MX machines. Thanks for explaining, I'm not against this override. Regards, Nikolay