From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Hartkopp Subject: Re: Fighting out-of-order reception with RPS? Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:48:22 +0200 Message-ID: <559E3556.3050803@hartkopp.net> References: <559D628C.5020100@hartkopp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.162]:27432 "EHLO mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751651AbbGIIs3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2015 04:48:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Holger Schurig Cc: "list@hauke-m.de:NETWORKING DRIVERS" , therbert.google.com@vger.kernel.org, "linux-can@vger.kernel.org" , sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com, jonathon.reinhart@gmail.com On 09.07.2015 08:34, Holger Schurig wrote: >> and has to be done by hand depending on where the CAN interfaces >> are attached to the system. > > No ... udev rules rock! :-) > Yeah. But it can not be the approach to fix a known problem in the kernel by urging people to make workarounds in userspace. For my testing I did it by hand. But in real life the kernel has to do 'the right thing' by having wise defaults without interaction. Regards, Oliver