From: mlangsdo@redhat.com (Mark Langsdorf)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Build failure on ARM64 for Linux 4.2-rc1 was: Linux 4.2-rc1
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 11:46:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559EA54C.4060807@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559BCC8A.1030708@redhat.com>
On 07/07/2015 07:56 AM, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
> On 07/05/2015 03:22 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> It's Sunday, two weeks have passed, and the merge window is closed. I
>> just pushed out the tag to the git trees, and tar-balls and patches
>> should be mirroring out too.
>
> I'm seeing a build regression on arm64 for tools/perf.
>
> On linux-4.1, it builds fine.
>
> On linux-4.2-rc1, it dies with this relevant message (skipping the
> missing defines, etc):
>
> /home/mlangsdorf/tmp/linux-4.2/include/linux/preempt.h: At top level:
> /home/mlangsdorf/tmp/linux-4.2/include/linux/preempt.h:64:25: fatal
> error: asm/preempt.h: No such file or directory
> #include <asm/preempt.h>
>
> On both versions, arch/arm64/include/generated/asm/preempt.h
> exists. I'm guessing something changed in the build system so
> that's its not being picked up for 4.2-rc1 but I'm not sure where
> to look.
Hi Peter,
I did a git bisect and it looks like the faulty patch is
d72da4a4d973d8a0a0d3c97e7cdebf287fbe3a99, "rbtree: Make lockless
searches non-fatal". I can't see why it causes my builds to fail,
but if I revert that patch and the related series, then I can
build the kernel and build tools/perf successfully.
Any insight into a less intensive way of fixing my build would
be appreciated.
--Mark Langsdorf
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: Build failure on ARM64 for Linux 4.2-rc1 was: Linux 4.2-rc1
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 11:46:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559EA54C.4060807@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559BCC8A.1030708@redhat.com>
On 07/07/2015 07:56 AM, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
> On 07/05/2015 03:22 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> It's Sunday, two weeks have passed, and the merge window is closed. I
>> just pushed out the tag to the git trees, and tar-balls and patches
>> should be mirroring out too.
>
> I'm seeing a build regression on arm64 for tools/perf.
>
> On linux-4.1, it builds fine.
>
> On linux-4.2-rc1, it dies with this relevant message (skipping the
> missing defines, etc):
>
> /home/mlangsdorf/tmp/linux-4.2/include/linux/preempt.h: At top level:
> /home/mlangsdorf/tmp/linux-4.2/include/linux/preempt.h:64:25: fatal
> error: asm/preempt.h: No such file or directory
> #include <asm/preempt.h>
>
> On both versions, arch/arm64/include/generated/asm/preempt.h
> exists. I'm guessing something changed in the build system so
> that's its not being picked up for 4.2-rc1 but I'm not sure where
> to look.
Hi Peter,
I did a git bisect and it looks like the faulty patch is
d72da4a4d973d8a0a0d3c97e7cdebf287fbe3a99, "rbtree: Make lockless
searches non-fatal". I can't see why it causes my builds to fail,
but if I revert that patch and the related series, then I can
build the kernel and build tools/perf successfully.
Any insight into a less intensive way of fixing my build would
be appreciated.
--Mark Langsdorf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-09 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-05 20:22 Linux 4.2-rc1 Linus Torvalds
2015-07-05 23:01 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-07-07 5:50 ` linux-next: stats (Was: Linux 4.2-rc1) Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-07 5:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-07 12:56 ` Build failure on ARM64 for Linux 4.2-rc1 was: Linux 4.2-rc1 Mark Langsdorf
2015-07-09 16:46 ` Mark Langsdorf [this message]
2015-07-09 16:46 ` Mark Langsdorf
2015-07-09 16:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-09 16:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-13 16:55 ` Mark Langsdorf
2015-07-13 16:55 ` Mark Langsdorf
2015-07-08 16:32 ` Shuah Khan
2015-07-08 17:05 ` Casey Schaufler
2015-07-08 17:33 ` Shuah Khan
2015-07-08 17:55 ` Casey Schaufler
2015-07-08 17:55 ` Casey Schaufler
2015-07-08 17:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-07-08 17:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-07-08 17:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2015-07-08 18:03 ` Stephen Smalley
2015-07-08 18:07 ` William Roberts
2015-07-08 18:45 ` Casey Schaufler
2015-07-09 0:58 ` Ming Lei
2015-07-09 3:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-07-09 5:00 ` Ming Lei
2015-07-09 13:10 ` Shuah Khan
2015-07-09 13:44 ` Shuah Khan
2015-07-09 13:47 ` Shuah Khan
2015-07-09 14:45 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-07-09 17:40 ` Shuah Khan
2015-07-10 16:58 ` Shuah Khan
2015-07-10 17:11 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <55A03A33.8060405@osg.samsung.com>
[not found] ` <CA+55aFzDu9acMKHJFkxzg+1jeHNpGRhmM=pu2z-so5QYTMbvcA@mail.gmail.com>
2015-07-10 21:57 ` Shuah Khan
2015-07-10 22:36 ` Ming Lei
2015-07-08 19:00 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559EA54C.4060807@redhat.com \
--to=mlangsdo@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.