All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
To: "Breana, Tiberiu A" <tiberiu.a.breana@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	"linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>, Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] iio:light:stk3310: add more error handling
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 19:50:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <559EB46B.8060104@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4586F61A4A291F4DA44D32824E7C0F402216D8AA@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>

Breana, Tiberiu A schrieb am 06.07.2015 um 11:30:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jonathan Cameron [mailto:jic23@kernel.org]
>> Sent: Sunday, July 5, 2015 2:25 PM
>> To: Hartmut Knaack; linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen; Peter Meerwald; Breana, Tiberiu A
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] iio:light:stk3310: add more error handling
>>
>> On 04/07/15 16:56, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
>>> Check for the following error cases:
>>>   * lower boundary for val in _write_event
>>>   * return value of regmap_(field_)read
>>>   * possible values for chan->type
>>>   * return value of stk3310_gpio_probe
>>>
>>> Also add an error-cleanup path in _probe to handle failure in
>>> iio_device_register and devm_request_threaded_irq.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
>> I'm not sure how I missed this before, but the probe order below is rather
>> unusual.  I'm a little bothered by the theoretical race condition between the
>> exposure of the device to userspace
>> (device_register) and the configuration of it's irq later.
>>
>> It is probably possible (in theory) to enable an event before the irq is
>> registered and get the event to fire, resulting in an unhandled interrupt.
>>
>> I'm going to hold back on the rest of this set until Tiberiu has had a chance to
>> comment on them anyway.
>>
>> Jonathan
> 
> Agreed, the probe order needs to be changed. Some comments below.
> 
> Tiberiu
> 
<...>
>>> -611,11 +631,14 @@ static int stk3310_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>>  	ret = iio_device_register(indio_dev);
>>>  	if (ret < 0) {
>>>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "device_register failed\n");
>>> -		stk3310_set_state(data, STK3310_STATE_STANDBY);
>>> +		goto err_standby;
>>>  	}
>>>
>>> -	if (client->irq <= 0)
>>> +	if (client->irq <= 0) {
> 
> Sort of unrelated to your patch, but I think this should be (client->irq < 0)
> I would appreciate it if you would include it in your next patch set :)
> 

No problem, this will be included in my new revision.

>>>  		client->irq = stk3310_gpio_probe(client);
>>> +		if (client->irq < 0)
>>> +			goto err_unregister;
>>> +	}
>>>
>>>  	if (client->irq >= 0) {
>>>  		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&client->dev, client->irq,
>> @@
>>> -624,11 +647,20 @@ static int stk3310_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>>  						IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING |
>>>  						IRQF_ONESHOT,
>>>  						STK3310_EVENT, indio_dev);
>>> -		if (ret < 0)
>>> +		if (ret < 0) {
>>>  			dev_err(&client->dev, "request irq %d failed\n",
>>>  					client->irq);
>>> +			goto err_unregister;
>>> +		}
>>>  	}
>>>
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +
>>> +err_unregister:
>>> +	iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
>> This made me nervous, as there is a very good reason the register is almost
>> always last in the probe function.  It exposes the interfaces to userspace (and
>> in kernel for that matter).  Everything must be ready before it is called.  Here
>> we could (though unlikely) get an unhandled interrupt as the handler has not
>> been registered as yet.
> 
> The iio_device_register block should indeed be moved to the end of _probe.
> 
>>> +err_standby:
>>> +	stk3310_set_state(data, STK3310_STATE_STANDBY);
>>> +
>>>  	return ret;
>>>  }
>>>
>>>
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-09 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-04 15:56 [PATCH 0/5] stk3310 fixes and cleanup Hartmut Knaack
2015-07-04 15:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] iio:light:stk3310: Fix REGMAP_I2C dependency Hartmut Knaack
2015-07-05 11:19   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-07-04 15:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] iio:light:stk3310: make endianness independent of host Hartmut Knaack
2015-07-06  9:05   ` Breana, Tiberiu A
2015-07-04 15:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] iio:light:stk3310: add more error handling Hartmut Knaack
2015-07-05 11:24   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-07-06  9:30     ` Breana, Tiberiu A
2015-07-09 17:50       ` Hartmut Knaack [this message]
2015-07-04 15:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] iio:light:stk3310: use correct names and type for state Hartmut Knaack
2015-07-06  9:33   ` Breana, Tiberiu A
2015-07-04 15:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] iio:light:stk3310: adjust indentation Hartmut Knaack
2015-07-06  9:34   ` Breana, Tiberiu A

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=559EB46B.8060104@gmx.de \
    --to=knaack.h@gmx.de \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
    --cc=tiberiu.a.breana@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.