Re: [v7][PATCH 16/16] tools: parse to enable new rdm policy parameters

["Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>]

> The first issue (which would really be relevant to the documentation
> patch) is that the documentation is in a separate commit.  There are
> sometimes valid reasons for doing this.  I'm not sure if they apply,

Wei suggested we should organize/spit all patches according to libxl, 
libxc, xc and xl.

> but if they do this should be explained in one of the commit
> messages.  If this was done I'm afraid I have missed it.

In this patch head description, maybe I can change something like this

This patch parses to enable user configurable parameters to specify
RDM resource and according policies which are defined previously,

>
>> +                }else if ( !strcmp(optkey, "rdm_policy") ) {
>> +                    if ( !strcmp(tok, "strict") ) {
>> +                        pcidev->rdm_policy = LIBXL_RDM_RESERVE_POLICY_STRICT;
>> +                    } else if ( !strcmp(tok, "relaxed") ) {
>> +                        pcidev->rdm_policy = LIBXL_RDM_RESERVE_POLICY_RELAXED;
>> +                    } else {
>> +                        XLU__PCI_ERR(cfg, "%s is not an valid PCI RDM property"
>> +                                          " policy: 'strict' or 'relaxed'.",
>> +                                     tok);
>> +                        goto parse_error;
>> +                    }
>
> This section has coding style (whitespace) problems and long lines.
> If you need to respin, please fix them.

Are you saying this?

} else if (  -> }else if (
} else { -> }else {

Additionally I don't found which line is over 80 characters.

>
>> +    for (tok = ptr, end = ptr + strlen(ptr) + 1; ptr < end; ptr++) {
>> +        switch(state) {
>> +        case STATE_TYPE:
>> +            if (*ptr == '=') {
>> +                state = STATE_RDM_STRATEGY;
>> +                *ptr = '\0';
>> +                if (strcmp(tok, "strategy")) {
>> +                    XLU__PCI_ERR(cfg, "Unknown RDM state option: %s", tok);
>> +                    goto parse_error;
>> +                }
>> +                tok = ptr + 1;
>> +            }
>
> This code is extremely repetitive.
>

I just refer to xlu_pci_parse_bdf()

         switch(state) {
         case STATE_DOMAIN:
             if ( *ptr == ':' ) {
                 state = STATE_BUS;
                 *ptr = '\0';
                 if ( hex_convert(tok, &dom, 0xffff) )
                     goto parse_error;
                 tok = ptr + 1;
             }
             break;

> Really I would prefer that this parsing was done with a miniature flex
> parser, rather than ad-hoc pointer arithmetic and use of strtok.

Sorry, could you show this explicitly?

Thanks
Tiejun