From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH] virt: IRQ bypass manager Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 23:09:35 +0200 Message-ID: <55A0348F.606@redhat.com> References: <20150710173825.1031.42542.stgit@gimli.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eric.auger@st.com, eric.auger@linaro.org, joro@8bytes.org, avi.kivity@gmail.com, feng.wu@intel.com To: Alex Williamson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150710173825.1031.42542.stgit@gimli.home> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 10/07/2015 19:52, Alex Williamson wrote: > Perhaps if a second consumer comes along that would be justification for > tying it elsewhere in the build system. ARM will obviously need to do > similar. Are there better options? > > Also, there's no maintainer for the top level virt/ directory. Paolo, > would you feel comfortable taking this, maybe with some additional acks? That's okay; alternatively, we can share it since after all you wrote most of it. Paolo > That would probably be the most convenient for merging the consumer code. > Thanks,