From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ken Dreyer Subject: Re: debian packaging for wip-10587-split-servers Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:56:48 -0600 Message-ID: <55A04DB0.1070400@redhat.com> References: <559E99D8.9060208@redhat.com> <55A04D18.70202@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40985 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752009AbbGJW4u (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:56:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <55A04D18.70202@redhat.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: kefu chai Cc: ceph-maintainers@ceph.com, "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" On 07/10/2015 04:54 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote: > I've done some testing with a dummy package and this works. "apt-get > upgrade" kept the update back, since there were new packages introduced, > but "apt-get dist-upgrade" worked. Is that expected? (... newbie Debian > user here :D ) > > I've pushed this approach to > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/wip-10587-split-servers. Whoops, I lied, there's nothing new on that branch yet. I'll have to pick this back up on Monday :) Hopefully my reasoning above sounds correct, though? - Ken