All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <55A0A5EB.4090007@wwwdotorg.org>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 7576e18..bed73dc 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Is "4" there the CPU count? Perhaps this should use one of the Linux
 APIs to query the CPU count rather than hard-coding it?
 
 Should per-CPU IRQs automatically be masked on all CPUs at once, or only
-on the current CPU? A very quick look@the ARM GIC driver implies it
+on the current CPU? A very quick look at the ARM GIC driver implies it
 doesn't iterate over all CPUs when masking per-CPU IRQs.
 
 > +static void bcm2836_mask_gpu_irq(struct irq_data *d)
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 749316e..7f68740 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,9 +1,17 @@
  "ref\01436303617-17185-1-git-send-email-eric@anholt.net\0"
  "ref\01436303617-17185-5-git-send-email-eric@anholt.net\0"
- "From\0swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH 4/4] irqchip: Add bcm2836 interrupt controller for Raspberry Pi 2.\0"
+ "From\0Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 4/4] irqchip: Add bcm2836 interrupt controller for Raspberry Pi 2.\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 10 Jul 2015 23:13:15 -0600\0"
- "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>"
+ " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "Cc\0devicetree@vger.kernel.org"
+  Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
+  Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@gmail.com>
+  Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+ " Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 07/07/2015 03:13 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:\n"
@@ -46,7 +54,7 @@
  "APIs to query the CPU count rather than hard-coding it?\n"
  "\n"
  "Should per-CPU IRQs automatically be masked on all CPUs at once, or only\n"
- "on the current CPU? A very quick look@the ARM GIC driver implies it\n"
+ "on the current CPU? A very quick look at the ARM GIC driver implies it\n"
  "doesn't iterate over all CPUs when masking per-CPU IRQs.\n"
  "\n"
  "> +static void bcm2836_mask_gpu_irq(struct irq_data *d)\n"
@@ -76,4 +84,4 @@
  "\n"
  Given that bcm2836_send_ipi() is #ifdef CONFIG_SMP, should this code be too?
 
-7c40ba8b470e84813ddafac5fc263ac6a2e794966d2fdee8ac5ab49ef5305d81
+e4baf7a4cf3c2ea5acdb764d7a01d0c33f3fc9b5ca259b29569fe061b1344f65

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index 7576e18..bed73dc 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Is "4" there the CPU count? Perhaps this should use one of the Linux
 APIs to query the CPU count rather than hard-coding it?
 
 Should per-CPU IRQs automatically be masked on all CPUs at once, or only
-on the current CPU? A very quick look@the ARM GIC driver implies it
+on the current CPU? A very quick look at the ARM GIC driver implies it
 doesn't iterate over all CPUs when masking per-CPU IRQs.
 
 > +static void bcm2836_mask_gpu_irq(struct irq_data *d)
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index 749316e..e1e6f33 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -1,9 +1,17 @@
  "ref\01436303617-17185-1-git-send-email-eric@anholt.net\0"
  "ref\01436303617-17185-5-git-send-email-eric@anholt.net\0"
- "From\0swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH 4/4] irqchip: Add bcm2836 interrupt controller for Raspberry Pi 2.\0"
+ "From\0Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 4/4] irqchip: Add bcm2836 interrupt controller for Raspberry Pi 2.\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 10 Jul 2015 23:13:15 -0600\0"
- "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>"
+ " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "Cc\0linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
+  devicetree@vger.kernel.org
+  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
+  Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
+ " Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@gmail.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 07/07/2015 03:13 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:\n"
@@ -46,7 +54,7 @@
  "APIs to query the CPU count rather than hard-coding it?\n"
  "\n"
  "Should per-CPU IRQs automatically be masked on all CPUs at once, or only\n"
- "on the current CPU? A very quick look@the ARM GIC driver implies it\n"
+ "on the current CPU? A very quick look at the ARM GIC driver implies it\n"
  "doesn't iterate over all CPUs when masking per-CPU IRQs.\n"
  "\n"
  "> +static void bcm2836_mask_gpu_irq(struct irq_data *d)\n"
@@ -76,4 +84,4 @@
  "\n"
  Given that bcm2836_send_ipi() is #ifdef CONFIG_SMP, should this code be too?
 
-7c40ba8b470e84813ddafac5fc263ac6a2e794966d2fdee8ac5ab49ef5305d81
+4d53d8845ea0f4ced380de81b5778de99f4e098fc0b1b604c7659c459a45e446

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.