From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 7F850E008CE; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 07:04:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (picmaster[at]mail.bg) * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [193.201.172.118 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mx2.mail.bg (mx2.mail.bg [193.201.172.118]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D4EE0086E for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 07:03:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.62] (unknown [93.152.143.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7271460055D7; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:03:52 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mail.bg; s=default; t=1436796232; bh=QngyRodtwjeqE/IQLRhFSvaIZvHsymgKH2VtuvfhOZU=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Ff8TihkOoHJoNziIdU6OahFP8ucFfEPy1QHvF4LrZ3/d4kaVbocSJmmt/jAsYrTmf f87+/D/UH7pLkO9Zytdmo0+rSS1giHaeuY/G24n6687wpyOG6cVO6noZF/MnazKMyQ PDcQvN3x60ULEV1AtAUR5wd4+1yeoYNpNyOtMRFA= Message-ID: <55A3C548.3020408@mail.bg> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:03:52 +0300 From: Nikolay Dimitrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ann Thornton , Ann Thornton , meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org References: <1436553125-15487-1-git-send-email-ra43240@freescale.com> <55A01B38.8090806@mail.bg> <55A03A2C.8030605@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <55A03A2C.8030605@freescale.com> Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-demos][PATCH] New packagegroups to organize tools X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:04:00 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Ann, On 07/11/2015 12:33 AM, Ann Thornton wrote: > On 7/10/2015 2:21 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: >> Hi Ann, >> >> On 07/10/2015 09:32 PM, Ann Thornton wrote: >>> The tools are grouped into core and extended with i.MX specific >>> tools in a .bbappend file. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ann Thornton >>> --- >>> .../packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-tools-core.bb | 39 >>> +++++++++++++++++ >>> .../packagegroup-fsl-tools-extended.bb | 45 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++ >>> .../packagegroup-fsl-tools-extended.bbappend | 13 ++++++ >>> 3 files changed, 97 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 >>> recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-tools-core.bb >>> create mode 100644 >>> recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-tools-extended.bb >>> create mode 100644 >>> recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-tools-extended.bbappend >> >> Just curious regarding the naming of packagegroup-fsl-tools-core: what >> makes it FSL-specific? > > Nothing, really. Except that this is fsl-demos. Should it be named > without the fsl? I think it would be better this way. I also looked at the extended packagegroup, and it can also go without the fsl. I'm leaving the final choice to your discretion. > > Thanks for the comments! > Ann Regards, Nikolay