From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51458) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZEesD-0007k4-5G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 10:38:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZEes9-0000ev-5B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 10:38:25 -0400 Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:57050) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZEes8-0000dy-UQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 10:38:21 -0400 Message-ID: <55A3CD5A.9020308@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:38:18 +0300 From: Michael Tokarev MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <553DDD8D.6050602@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <55A3B2E2.9060301@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <55A3CBCE.4000606@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <55A3CBCE.4000606@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] libcacard: cac_is_cac_card? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel 13.07.2015 17:31, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> and it is mentioned in libcacard/libcacard.syms. >>> >>> But it is not defined anywhere. > If it's not defined, its mention in libcacard.syms has no effect and the > references can be removed. That's two statements. First statement - its mention in .syms has no effect - is a bit wrong. I found it _because_ this mention has some effect. In particular, when building it on Debian the package system complains that it can't find the symbol to be exported. But okay, I'll just remove it from the .syms file. Thanks, /mjt