From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: clk: change clk_ops' ->determine_rate() prototype
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:41:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A43E8B.8020104@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150710082612.GC29999@mwanda>
On 07/10/2015 01:26 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Boris Brezillon,
>
> This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
>
> The patch 4a7c639697ef: "clk: change clk_ops' ->determine_rate()
> prototype" from Jul 7, 2015, leads to the following Smatch complaint:
>
> drivers/clk/clk.c:458 clk_mux_determine_rate_flags()
> error: we previously assumed 'parent' could be null (see line 452)
>
> drivers/clk/clk.c
> 451 if (core->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) {
> 452 ret = __clk_determine_rate(parent ? parent->hw : NULL,
> ^^^^^^
> Check for NULL.
>
> 453 &parent_req);
> 454 if (ret)
> 455 return ret;
> 456
> 457 best = parent_req.rate;
> 458 req->best_parent_hw = parent->hw;
> ^^^^^^^^^^
> Patch adds unchecked dereference.
>
> 459 req->best_parent_rate = best;
> 460 } else if (parent) {
>
>
Thanks Dan.
Boris,
It looks like the transformation here isn't equivalent. If parent is
NULL here and we don't crash, parent_req->rate == req->rate and before
this patch req->rate would be 0 instead. How about this patch squashed
in? It includes some of the removals of best_parent_* assignments that
you had in your follow-up patch, because those make it equivalent to the
previous code.
------8<----
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index c182d8a7924e..244a6535c69c 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -455,16 +455,10 @@ clk_mux_determine_rate_flags(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req,
return ret;
best = parent_req.rate;
- req->best_parent_hw = parent->hw;
- req->best_parent_rate = best;
} else if (parent) {
best = clk_core_get_rate_nolock(parent);
- req->best_parent_hw = parent->hw;
- req->best_parent_rate = best;
} else {
best = clk_core_get_rate_nolock(core);
- req->best_parent_hw = NULL;
- req->best_parent_rate = 0;
}
goto out;
@@ -810,8 +804,10 @@ static int clk_core_round_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
*/
int __clk_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req)
{
- if (!hw)
+ if (!hw) {
+ req->rate = 0;
return 0;
+ }
return clk_core_round_rate_nolock(hw->core, req);
}
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-13 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-10 8:26 clk: change clk_ops' ->determine_rate() prototype Dan Carpenter
2015-07-13 22:41 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-07-14 10:45 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A43E8B.8020104@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.