From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: hammer-backports branch is ready to schedule suites (v0.94.3) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 01:28:47 +0200 Message-ID: <55A6ECAF.4020402@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UdgkOjcQg8u5nGlri31AAMrHbLbOGJe3m" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:50797 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753606AbbGOX2z (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:28:55 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Abhishek L Cc: Nathan Cutler , Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --UdgkOjcQg8u5nGlri31AAMrHbLbOGJe3m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Abhishek, The last pull request from the previous integration branch was merged ( h= ttps://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4891 ). http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11990#teuthology-run-commit-0c435d3974c9aa= 215ea10c6e9eed30ada6dbc390-hammer-backports-July-15 The ceph.spec.in pull request are not included (I made it so all of them = have ceph.spec.in in the pull request title) because they conflict and th= e suite use debian packages.=20 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pulls?utf8=3D%E2%9C%93&q=3Dis%3Aopen+is%3Apr= +milestone%3Ahammer+ceph.spec.in+in%3Atitle I believe running them one by one through the gitbuilders is the best we = can do right now. Cheers --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --UdgkOjcQg8u5nGlri31AAMrHbLbOGJe3m Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlWm7K8ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F208sACgwaG2bKqdse/wzlTK2HQ1tXhs QogAoKHUa18aD0l16Ohatl/Jv5LZQdkk =F2Pa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UdgkOjcQg8u5nGlri31AAMrHbLbOGJe3m--