From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yang Hongyang Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxl/remus: fix the return value of the checkpoint callback Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:45:14 +0800 Message-ID: <55A71ABA.6070008@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1436956363-4217-1-git-send-email-yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com> <1436962410.32371.25.camel@citrix.com> <21926.25110.109866.876891@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <21926.25110.109866.876891@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson , Ian Campbell Cc: Wei Liu , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 07/15/2015 09:37 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH] libxl/remus: fix the return value of the checkpoint callback"): >> Does that mean it won't apply to current staging? > > Indeed it doesn't. > >> I think we probably want this fix ASAP rather than waiting for that >> series? > > Yes. Patch just sent. Untested but fairly obvious. Yang, do you > want to test this, or do you want us to apply it as-is ? I don't have > a remus test setup. Please apply, thanks! > > This is the second rc-handling bug in 31c836f4 "libxl: events: Permit > timeouts to signal ao abort". I am going to re-read that patch to see > if I can find any more. > > Ian. > . > -- Thanks, Yang.