From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Chen, Tiejun" Subject: Re: [v8][PATCH 03/16] xen/passthrough: extend hypercall to support rdm reservation policy Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:48:20 +0800 Message-ID: <55A761C4.3050203@intel.com> References: <1437029582-19564-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com> <1437029582-19564-4-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com> <55A77C140200007800091ACB@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <55A77C140200007800091ACB@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Kevin Tian , Keir Fraser , Ian Campbell , Andrew Cooper , Tim Deegan , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Stefano Stabellini , Suravee Suthikulpanit , Yang Zhang , Aravind Gopalakrishnan List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 2015/7/16 15:40, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 16.07.15 at 08:52, wrote: >> @@ -1577,9 +1578,15 @@ int iommu_do_pci_domctl( >> seg = machine_sbdf >> 16; >> bus = PCI_BUS(machine_sbdf); >> devfn = PCI_DEVFN2(machine_sbdf); >> + flag = domctl->u.assign_device.flag; >> + if ( flag > XEN_DOMCTL_DEV_RDM_RELAXED ) > > Didn't we settle on flag & ~XEN_DOMCTL_DEV_RDM_RELAXED? Sorry its my fault to miss this merge. BTW, could I resend this patch separately to get your Ack? If you don't have other objections. Thanks Tiejun