From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH OSSTEST] ts-windows-install: bump ram size to 1.75G Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:38:04 +0100 Message-ID: <55A7898C.3050209@citrix.com> References: <1437042973-22985-1-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFgYM-0008Fu-OR for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:38:10 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1437042973-22985-1-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Wei Liu , Xen-devel Cc: ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 16/07/15 11:36, Wei Liu wrote: > The recommended size of Windows 7 64bit is 2G, 512MB is probably too > low. Given that all hosts in Cambridge instance have at least 4G ram and > all hosts in colo have at least 8G, we bump Windows ram size to a more > reasonable value. > > The value 1.75G is chosen because we might want to test Windows guest > migration in the future. This value should make it possible to do local > migration on 4G machines (512MB Dom0 + 1.75G source guest + 1.75G > incoming guest). > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu Similar to my reply to Ian, but 1.75 + 1.75 + 0.5 is 4. Where do you expect Xen to run in this setup? ~Andrew