From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
To: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [v8][PATCH 07/16] hvmloader/e820: construct guest e820 table
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 16:33:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A7CEBB.8090701@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A7CDBF.1030104@intel.com>
On 07/16/2015 04:29 PM, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
>
>
> On 2015/7/16 23:16, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 07/16/2015 04:04 PM, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
>>>> Yes, sorry, add_high_mem will be the size of memory *relocated*, not
>>>> the actual end of it (unless, as you say, the original highmem region
>>>> didn't exist).
>>>>
>>>> What I really meant was that either way, after adjusting the highmem
>>>> region in the e820, the end of that region should correspond to
>>>> hvm_info->high_mem_pgend.
>>>>
>>>> What about something like this?
>>>> ---
>>>> /*
>>>> * And then we also need to adjust highmem.
>>>> */
>>>> if ( add_high_mem )
>>>> {
>>>> /*
>>>> * Modify the existing highmem region if it exists
>>>> */
>>>> for ( i = 0; i < nr; i++ )
>>>> {
>>>> if ( e820[i].type == E820_RAM &&
>>>> e820[i].addr == (1ull << 32))
>>>> {
>>>> e820[i].size += add_high_mem;
>>>> break;
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> * If we didn't find a highmem region, make one
>>>> */
>>>> if ( i == nr )
>>>> {
>>>> e820[nr].addr = ((uint64_t)1 << 32);
>>>> e820[nr].size = e820[nr].addr + add_high_mem;
>>>> e820[nr].type = E820_RAM;
>>>> nr++;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> * Either way, at this point i points to the entry containing
>>>> * highmem. Compare it to what's in hvm_info as a sanity
>>>> * check.
>>>> */
>>>> BUG_ON(e820[i].addr+e820[i].size !=
>>>> ((uint64_t)hvm_info->high_mem_pgend << PAGE_SHIFT));
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>
>>> Looks really better.
>>>
>>> I just introduce a little change based on yours, and I post this as a
>>> whole,
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c
>>> b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c
>>> index 7a414ab..8c9b01f 100644
>>> --- a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c
>>> +++ b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c
>>> @@ -105,7 +105,10 @@ int build_e820_table(struct e820entry *e820,
>>> unsigned int lowmem_reserved_base,
>>> unsigned int bios_image_base)
>>> {
>>> - unsigned int nr = 0;
>>> + unsigned int nr = 0, i, j;
>>> + uint32_t low_mem_end = hvm_info->low_mem_pgend << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> + uint64_t high_mem_end = (uint64_t)hvm_info->high_mem_pgend <<
>>> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> + uint64_t add_high_mem = 0;
>>>
>>> if ( !lowmem_reserved_base )
>>> lowmem_reserved_base = 0xA0000;
>>> @@ -149,13 +152,6 @@ int build_e820_table(struct e820entry *e820,
>>> e820[nr].type = E820_RESERVED;
>>> nr++;
>>>
>>> - /* Low RAM goes here. Reserve space for special pages. */
>>> - BUG_ON((hvm_info->low_mem_pgend << PAGE_SHIFT) < (2u << 20));
>>> - e820[nr].addr = 0x100000;
>>> - e820[nr].size = (hvm_info->low_mem_pgend << PAGE_SHIFT) -
>>> e820[nr].addr;
>>> - e820[nr].type = E820_RAM;
>>> - nr++;
>>> -
>>> /*
>>> * Explicitly reserve space for special pages.
>>> * This space starts at RESERVED_MEMBASE an extends to cover
>>> various
>>> @@ -191,16 +187,91 @@ int build_e820_table(struct e820entry *e820,
>>> nr++;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -
>>> - if ( hvm_info->high_mem_pgend )
>>> + /*
>>> + * Construct E820 table according to recorded memory map.
>>> + *
>>> + * The memory map created by toolstack may include,
>>> + *
>>> + * #1. Low memory region
>>> + *
>>> + * Low RAM starts at least from 1M to make sure all standard
>>> regions
>>> + * of the PC memory map, like BIOS, VGA memory-mapped I/O and
>>> vgabios,
>>> + * have enough space.
>>> + *
>>> + * #2. Reserved regions if they exist
>>> + *
>>> + * #3. High memory region if it exists
>>> + */
>>> + for ( i = 0; i < memory_map.nr_map; i++ )
>>> {
>>> - e820[nr].addr = ((uint64_t)1 << 32);
>>> - e820[nr].size =
>>> - ((uint64_t)hvm_info->high_mem_pgend << PAGE_SHIFT) -
>>> e820[nr].addr;
>>> - e820[nr].type = E820_RAM;
>>> + e820[nr] = memory_map.map[i];
>>> nr++;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + /* Low RAM goes here. Reserve space for special pages. */
>>> + BUG_ON(low_mem_end < (2u << 20));
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Its possible to relocate RAM to allocate sufficient MMIO
>>> previously
>>> + * so low_mem_pgend would be changed over there. And here
>>> memory_map[]
>>> + * records the original low/high memory, so if low_mem_end is less
>>> than
>>> + * the original we need to revise low/high memory range in e820.
>>> + */
>>> + for ( i = 0; i < nr; i++ )
>>> + {
>>> + uint64_t end = e820[i].addr + e820[i].size;
>>> + if ( e820[i].type == E820_RAM &&
>>> + low_mem_end > e820[i].addr && low_mem_end < end )
>>> + {
>>> + add_high_mem = end - low_mem_end;
>>> + e820[i].size = low_mem_end - e820[i].addr;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * And then we also need to adjust highmem.
>>> + */
>>> + if ( add_high_mem )
>>> + {
>>> + /* Modify the existing highmem region if it exists. */
>>> + for ( i = 0; i < nr; i++ )
>>> + {
>>> + if ( e820[i].type == E820_RAM &&
>>> + e820[i].addr == ((uint64_t)1 << 32))
>>> + {
>>> + e820[i].size += add_high_mem;
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* If there was no highmem region, just create one. */
>>> + if ( i == nr )
>>> + {
>>> + e820[nr].addr = ((uint64_t)1 << 32);
>>> + e820[nr].size = high_mem_end - e820[nr].addr;
>>> + e820[nr].type = E820_RAM;
>>> + nr++;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* A sanity check if high memory is broken. */
>>> + BUG_ON( high_mem_end != e820[i].addr + e820[i].size);
>>
>> The reason I wrote it the way I did was so that we would cross-check our
>> lowmem adjustments (via add_high_mem) with the value in hvm_info in
>> *both cases*.
>>
>> In the code above, you'll get the sanity check if we modify an existing
>> e820 entry; but if we create a new entry, then we don't check to make
>> sure that the amount we removed from the lowmem entry equals the amount
>> we added to the highmem entry.
>
> Are you saying the following two cases are not same?
>
> uint64_t high_mem_end = (uint64_t)hvm_info->high_mem_pgend << PAGE_SHIFT;
> BUG_ON( high_mem_end != e820[i].addr + e820[i].size);
> vs.
> BUG_ON(e820[i].addr+e820[i].size != ((uint64_t)hvm_info->high_mem_pgend
> << PAGE_SHIFT));
>
> Why? Note hvm_info->high_mem_pgend don't change while build e820 table.
>
> Honestly I didn't try to change that point but maybe I'm missing something?
Yes, you are missing something. :-) I told you exactly what I wanted
changed and what I said could remain the same:
>> By all means, calculate high_mem_end so it's easier to read. But then,
>> when creating a new region, set e820[nr].size = add_high_mem, so that
>> the BUG_ON() that follows actually checks something useful.
Just to be clear, I want the second if() statement to look like this:
>>> + if ( i == nr )
>>> + {
>>> + e820[nr].addr = ((uint64_t)1 << 32);
>>> + e820[nr].size = add_high_mem;
>>> + e820[nr].type = E820_RAM;
>>> + nr++;
>>> + }
Think about why and maybe that will help you understand what I'm talking
about.
-George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-16 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-17 0:45 [v9][PATCH 00/16] Fix RMRR Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH " Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 01/16] xen: introduce XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 02/16] xen/vtd: create RMRR mapping Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 03/16] xen/passthrough: extend hypercall to support rdm reservation policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 7:40 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-16 7:48 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 7:58 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-16 11:09 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 04/16] xen: enable XENMEM_memory_map in hvm Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 05/16] hvmloader: get guest memory map into memory_map[] Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 9:18 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-16 11:15 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 06/16] hvmloader/pci: disable all pci devices conflicting with rdm Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 11:32 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 11:52 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 13:02 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 13:21 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 13:32 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-16 13:48 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 14:54 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-16 15:20 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 15:39 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 16:08 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 16:40 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 21:24 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 16:18 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 16:31 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 21:15 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-17 9:26 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-17 10:55 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 07/16] hvmloader/e820: construct guest e820 table Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 11:47 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 13:12 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 14:29 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 15:04 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 15:16 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 15:29 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 15:33 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2015-07-16 15:42 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 08/16] tools/libxc: Expose new hypercall xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 09/16] tools: extend xc_assign_device() to support rdm reservation policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 10/16] tools: introduce some new parameters to set rdm policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 11/16] tools/libxl: detect and avoid conflicts with RDM Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 12/16] tools: introduce a new parameter to set a predefined rdm boundary Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 13/16] libxl: construct e820 map with RDM information for HVM guest Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:53 ` [v8][PATCH 14/16] xen/vtd: enable USB device assignment Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:53 ` [v8][PATCH 15/16] xen/vtd: prevent from assign the device with shared rmrr Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 7:42 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-16 6:53 ` [v8][PATCH 16/16] tools: parse to enable new rdm policy parameters Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 01/16] xen: introduce XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 02/16] xen/vtd: create RMRR mapping Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 03/16] xen/passthrough: extend hypercall to support rdm reservation policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 6:48 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-20 1:12 ` Tian, Kevin
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 04/16] xen: enable XENMEM_memory_map in hvm Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 05/16] hvmloader: get guest memory map into memory_map[] Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 06/16] hvmloader/pci: disable all pci devices conflicting with rdm Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 13:59 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-17 14:24 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 07/16] hvmloader/e820: construct guest e820 table Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 7:40 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-17 9:09 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-17 10:50 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-17 15:22 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-17 15:31 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-17 15:54 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-17 16:06 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-17 16:10 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-18 12:35 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-20 6:19 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-17 9:27 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-17 10:53 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 08/16] tools/libxc: Expose new hypercall xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 09/16] tools: extend xc_assign_device() to support rdm reservation policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 10/16] tools: introduce some new parameters to set rdm policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 11/16] tools/libxl: detect and avoid conflicts with RDM Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 12/16] tools: introduce a new parameter to set a predefined rdm boundary Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 13/16] libxl: construct e820 map with RDM information for HVM guest Tiejun Chen
2015-07-22 13:55 ` [v8][PATCH 13/16] libxl: construct e820 map with RDM information for HVM guest [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 14/16] xen/vtd: enable USB device assignment Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 15/16] xen/vtd: prevent from assign the device with shared rmrr Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 16/16] tools: parse to enable new rdm policy parameters Tiejun Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A7CEBB.8090701@citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.