From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, lersek@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
stefanha@redhat.com, rjones@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] AioContext: fix broken ctx->dispatching optimization
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 04:27:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A8682E.5090609@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150717022525.GA13284@ad.nay.redhat.com>
On 17/07/2015 04:25, Fam Zheng wrote:
> What if aio_notify happens after the previous aio_dispatch() but before the
> next necessary atomic_add? The aio_notify would still skip the
> event_notifier_set(), and the next ppoll() will not return. For example:
>
> Thread A Thread B
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> aio_poll(blocking=true)
> aio_notify()
> smp_mb()
> if (ctx->notify_me) /* false! */
> atomic_add(ctx->notify_me, 2)
> ppoll()
> atomic_sub(ctx->notify_me, 2) event_notifier_set() /* not run */
It's not a problem because ppoll() has exited. The next call to
aio_poll or aio_ctx_prepare will notice the bottom half, do a
non-blocking ppoll(), and then service the bottom half.
>
> And if that's not a problem, why don't we need something like ACCESS_ONCE in
> aio_noitfy()?
Because there's already a smp_mb() which is stronger.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-17 2:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-16 9:56 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] AioContext: ctx->dispatching is dead, all hail ctx->notify_me Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-16 9:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] tests: remove irrelevant assertions from test-aio Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-16 9:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] aio-win32: reorganize polling loop Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-16 9:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] AioContext: fix broken ctx->dispatching optimization Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-17 2:25 ` Fam Zheng
2015-07-17 2:27 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-07-17 4:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-17 8:39 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-16 11:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] AioContext: ctx->dispatching is dead, all hail ctx->notify_me Kevin Wolf
2015-07-16 12:44 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2015-07-16 19:05 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2015-07-16 22:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-17 0:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-17 4:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-17 9:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-17 12:58 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2015-07-17 13:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-17 13:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-17 13:39 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-17 13:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-17 13:53 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2015-07-17 14:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-17 13:57 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-17 14:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-17 14:18 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A8682E.5090609@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rjones@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.