From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: RFC on deprivileged x86 hypervisor device models Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:29:14 +0100 Message-ID: <55A8D8FA.3040804@citrix.com> References: <55A8D477.2060909@citrix.com> <55A8D87C.6060704@m2r.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <55A8D87C.6060704@m2r.biz> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Fabio Fantoni , Ben Catterall , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, JBeulich@suse.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 17/07/15 11:27, Fabio Fantoni wrote: > Il 17/07/2015 12:09, Ben Catterall ha scritto: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm working on an x86 proof-of-concept series to evaluate if it is >> feasible to move device models currently running in the hypervisor >> and x86 emulation code for HVM guests into a deprivileged context. >> >> I've put together the following document as I have been considering >> several different ways this could be achieved and was hoping to get >> feedback from maintainers before I go ahead. > > Have you already take a look to this patch serie? > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-07/msg00108.html > Running qemu as non-root has nothing to do whatsoever with this proposal. This proposal concerns the bits which are emulated *in the hypervisor*. ~Andrew