From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Kevin <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"ian.campbell@citrix.com" <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
"ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com" <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Yong Y Wang <yong.y.wang@intel.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Requesting for freeze exception for RMRR
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 23:26:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A91EA6.8030406@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A91B1D.1050406@citrix.com>
> The PCI allocation code is in a state, but it was in a similarly bad
> state before. I agree with Jan's point of the risk that these new
> changes cause a regression in booting guests, although we can mitigate
> that somewhat by testing.
>
> I feel at this point that we shouldn't block the RMRR bugfix on also
> fixing the PCI allocation algorithm (which was a pre-existing issue).
>
> Therefore, I recommend that v9 gets respun to v10 to address the current
> comments, and accepted. Afterwards, the PCI allocation algorithm gets
> worked on as a bugfix activity, to pro actively cater for the risk of
> regression.
If you have any good solution to fix the PCI allocation algorithm
completely, things couldn't be better :)
Thanks
Tiejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-17 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-13 6:31 Requesting for freeze exception for RMRR Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-13 8:11 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-13 11:41 ` Wei Liu
2015-07-14 1:27 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-14 9:29 ` Wei Liu
2015-07-17 1:16 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-17 9:17 ` Wei Liu
2015-07-17 9:24 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-17 9:30 ` Wei Liu
2015-07-17 13:21 ` Wei Liu
2015-07-17 13:43 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-17 14:01 ` Wei Liu
2015-07-17 14:33 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-17 15:11 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-17 15:26 ` Chen, Tiejun [this message]
2015-07-17 15:32 ` Wei Liu
2015-07-17 15:37 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-20 1:14 ` Tian, Kevin
2015-07-13 13:38 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-14 0:26 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-14 9:18 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-14 9:25 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-14 9:36 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-14 9:27 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-14 9:38 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A91EA6.8030406@intel.com \
--to=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=yong.y.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.