From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andre Przywara Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kvm-tool: Introduce downscript option Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 15:45:37 +0100 Message-ID: <55AD0991.3020508@arm.com> References: <1437384527-22987-1-git-send-email-fan.du@intel.com> <1437384527-22987-2-git-send-email-fan.du@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, penberg@kernel.org, Will Deacon , Marc Zyngier To: Fan Du Return-path: Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]:61807 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932524AbbGTOpc (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:45:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1437384527-22987-2-git-send-email-fan.du@intel.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, On 20/07/15 10:28, Fan Du wrote: > To detach tap device automatically from bridge when exiting, > just like the reverse of "script" does. > > Signed-off-by: Fan Du > --- > tools/kvm/include/kvm/virtio-net.h | 1 + > tools/kvm/virtio/net.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/kvm/include/kvm/virtio-net.h b/tools/kvm/include/kvm/virtio-net.h > index f435cc3..d136a09 100644 > --- a/tools/kvm/include/kvm/virtio-net.h > +++ b/tools/kvm/include/kvm/virtio-net.h > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ struct virtio_net_params { > const char *guest_ip; > const char *host_ip; > const char *script; > + const char *downscript; > const char *trans; > const char *tapif; > char guest_mac[6]; > diff --git a/tools/kvm/virtio/net.c b/tools/kvm/virtio/net.c > index 25b9496..f3f7200 100644 > --- a/tools/kvm/virtio/net.c > +++ b/tools/kvm/virtio/net.c > @@ -696,6 +696,8 @@ static int set_net_param(struct kvm *kvm, struct virtio_net_params *p, > die("Unknown network mode %s, please use user, tap or none", kvm->cfg.network); > } else if (strcmp(param, "script") == 0) { > p->script = strdup(val); > + } else if (strcmp(param, "downscript") == 0) { > + p->downscript = strdup(val); > } else if (strcmp(param, "guest_ip") == 0) { > p->guest_ip = strdup(val); > } else if (strcmp(param, "host_ip") == 0) { > @@ -871,6 +873,32 @@ virtio_dev_init(virtio_net__init); > > int virtio_net__exit(struct kvm *kvm) > { > + int pid; > + int status; > + struct virtio_net_params *params; > + struct net_dev *ndev; > + struct list_head *ptr; > + > + list_for_each(ptr, &ndevs) { > + ndev = list_entry(ptr, struct net_dev, list); > + params = ndev->params; > + /* Cleanup any tap device which attached to bridge */ > + if (ndev->mode == NET_MODE_TAP || Do you mean && here? Otherwise it may try to execute "none". > + strcmp(params->downscript, "none")) { > + pid = fork(); > + if (pid == 0) { > + execl(ndev->params->downscript, > + params->downscript, ndev->tap_name, NULL); > + _exit(1); > + } else { > + waitpid(pid, &status, 0); > + if (WIFEXITED(status) && WEXITSTATUS(status) != 0) { > + pr_warning("Fail to cleanup tap by %s", > + params->script); > + } > + } > + } > + } I think this should be moved into a separate function to avoid code duplication with the init script execution. Also it improves readability and avoids too long lines. Cheers, Andre. > return 0; > } > virtio_dev_exit(virtio_net__exit); >