Re: drivers/net/phy/dp83867.c:167: possible bad if ?

[Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>]

On 07/20/2015 12:40 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 20/07/15 10:37, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Florian
>>
>> On 07/20/2015 12:28 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> Adding Dan,
>>>
>>> On 20/07/15 05:37, David Binderman wrote:
>>>> Hello there,
>>>>
>>>> drivers/net/phy/dp83867.c:167:57: warning: logical ‘or’ of collectively exhaustive tests is always true [-Wlogical-op]
>>>>
>>>> Source code is
>>>>
>>>>     if ((phydev->interface>= PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID) ||
>>>>         (phydev->interface <= PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID)) {
>>>>
>>>> Maybe
>>>>
>>>>     if ((phydev->interface>= PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID) &&
>>>>         (phydev->interface <= PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID)) {
>>> Sounds like the former is the intended comparison that will make sure
>>> that phydev->interface is between MODE_RGMII_ID and MODE_RGMII_RXID, and
>>> not below or after.
>> That is correct.  The internal delay only needs to be set if this is declared
>> via the DT.  There can be one of 3 interface internal delay (RGMII_ID), RX internal delay (RGMII_RX_ID) or TX
>> internal delay (RGMII_TX_ID).
> Sorry, I meant to write the latter instead of the former here, the
> current code seems to be potentially too permissive, is not it? In that
> case, it seems to me like David's proposed fix is relevant.

The proposed fix is logically correct.  And it matches the code for
phy_interface_is_rgmii with the '&&'.

Did you want me to patch and test?

Dan

>
>> This internal delay is only applicable for RGMII and can be made specific to the
>> board.
>>
>> The driver only needs to set the delay per the declaration in the DT.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>


-- 
------------------
Dan Murphy