From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Razvan Cojocaru Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 15/15] tools/xen-access: altp2m testcases Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:20:59 +0300 Message-ID: <55ADD6BB.9020900@bitdefender.com> References: <1437436691-24449-1-git-send-email-edmund.h.white@intel.com> <1437436691-24449-16-git-send-email-edmund.h.white@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1437436691-24449-16-git-send-email-edmund.h.white@intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ed White , xen-devel@lists.xen.org Cc: Ravi Sahita , Wei Liu , Jan Beulich , George Dunlap , Tim Deegan , Ian Jackson , Jun Nakajima , Andrew Cooper , tlengyel@novetta.com, Daniel De Graaf List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 07/21/2015 02:58 AM, Ed White wrote: > From: Tamas K Lengyel > > Working altp2m test-case. Extended the test tool to support singlestepping > to better highlight the core feature of altp2m view switching. > > Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel > Signed-off-by: Ed White > > Reviewed-by: Razvan Cojocaru > Acked-by: Wei Liu > --- > tools/tests/xen-access/xen-access.c | 173 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 148 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) As previously discussed (privately) with Tamas, if an Acked-by is more appropriate here (since in the meantime MAINTAINERS has been updated), then please turn the Reviewed-by into an: Acked-by: Razvan Cojocaru I'm not sure this is required, since a recent xen-devel discussion has stated that Reviewed-by is stronger than, and implies, Acked-by, but just in case I've read that wrong I don't want to hold up the patch. Thanks, Razvan