From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: teuthology rados runs for next Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:44:23 +0200 Message-ID: <55AE0667.8020000@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="e53rPvkGe5cnLg38Cmr2PqObb7X2WirJE" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:53482 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754211AbbGUIoZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:44:25 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Samuel Just Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --e53rPvkGe5cnLg38Cmr2PqObb7X2WirJE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sam, I noticed today that http://pulpito.ceph.com/?suite=3Drados&branch=3Dnext= is lagging three days behind. Do we want to keep all the runs or should = we kill the older ones ? I suppose there would be value in having the res= ults for all of them but given the current load in the sepia lab it also = significantly delays them. What do you think ? Cheers --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --e53rPvkGe5cnLg38Cmr2PqObb7X2WirJE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlWuBmcACgkQ8dLMyEl6F21+lwCdEqdMZUnetCNS3pRIfw2cO7OX GjUAn0zbKmhaMPJ4tNv9uhSfHABjPqpP =UclG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --e53rPvkGe5cnLg38Cmr2PqObb7X2WirJE--