From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (mail.mlbassoc.com [65.100.170.105]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFCC73694 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:36:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 1998) id 93343F811DB; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:36:17 -0600 (MDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.1.114] (zeus [192.168.1.114]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6F2F811DA; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:36:17 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <55AE6705.5040907@mlbassoc.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:36:37 -0600 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yocto@yoctoproject.org References: In-Reply-To: Cc: openembedded-devel Subject: Re: [yocto] Question about IMAGE_INSTALL_append and CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:36:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2015-07-21 09:26, Victor Rodriguez wrote: > Hi team > > I have a question , according to documentation there is a difference between > > IMAGE_INSTALL_append > > and > > CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL > > Specifies the list of packages to be added to the image. You should > only set this variable in the local.conf configuration file found in > the Build Directory. > > When I use the second one and try to build a core-image-minimal-xfce > bitbake does not install what I wanted in my image . I had a really > hard time few weekends ago because of this. > > I wonder If I am missing something or if this is a bug The core-image-minimal-xfce recipe does not "play nice" with the core-image class and is not respecting CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL. I think this should be filed as a bug (and feel free to suggest a patch) BTW, this question should really be on the OpenEmbedded development list. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id C7EE8E0096A; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:36:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (mail.mlbassoc.com [65.100.170.105]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A5DE00837 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:36:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 1998) id AC5E7F811DA; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:36:17 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [192.168.1.114] (zeus [192.168.1.114]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6F2F811DA; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:36:17 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <55AE6705.5040907@mlbassoc.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:36:37 -0600 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yocto@yoctoproject.org References: In-Reply-To: Cc: openembedded-devel Subject: Re: Question about IMAGE_INSTALL_append and CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:36:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2015-07-21 09:26, Victor Rodriguez wrote: > Hi team > > I have a question , according to documentation there is a difference between > > IMAGE_INSTALL_append > > and > > CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL > > Specifies the list of packages to be added to the image. You should > only set this variable in the local.conf configuration file found in > the Build Directory. > > When I use the second one and try to build a core-image-minimal-xfce > bitbake does not install what I wanted in my image . I had a really > hard time few weekends ago because of this. > > I wonder If I am missing something or if this is a bug The core-image-minimal-xfce recipe does not "play nice" with the core-image class and is not respecting CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL. I think this should be filed as a bug (and feel free to suggest a patch) BTW, this question should really be on the OpenEmbedded development list. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------