From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: teuthology rados runs for next Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 17:42:37 +0200 Message-ID: <55AE686D.2010802@dachary.org> References: <55AE0667.8020000@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OALPe59B06oQVFkAM2lf78sJBPQBviT5I" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:53750 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754727AbbGUPmk (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:42:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sage Weil Cc: Samuel Just , Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --OALPe59B06oQVFkAM2lf78sJBPQBviT5I Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok ! teuthology-kill -m multi -r teuthology-2015-07-18_21:00:09-rados-next-dis= tro-basic-multi teuthology-kill -m multi -r teuthology-2015-07-20_21:00:09-rados-next-dis= tro-basic-multi I observed that the older=20 http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2015-07-17_21:00:10-rados-next-distro-= basic-multi is half way through but does not seem to make progress while the one sche= duled today http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2015-07-19_21:00:10-rados-next-distro-= basic-multi has one job running. Do you think best to kill the newer so it does not c= ompete for resources that would prevent the older from finishing ? I'd be= tempted to kill the newer because it's so difficult to get jobs running = right now that it makes sense to preserve a run that already managed to p= ass > 100 jobs :-) Cheers On 21/07/2015 15:43, Sage Weil wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Loic Dachary wrote: >> Hi Sam, >> >> I noticed today that http://pulpito.ceph.com/?suite=3Drados&branch=3Dn= ext is=20 >> lagging three days behind. Do we want to keep all the runs or should w= e=20 >> kill the older ones ? I suppose there would be value in having the=20 >> results for all of them but given the current load in the sepia lab it= =20 >> also significantly delays them. What do you think ? >=20 > I think it's better to kill old scheduled runs. >=20 --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --OALPe59B06oQVFkAM2lf78sJBPQBviT5I Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlWuaG0ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F22q2ACeMlPduT1P36IKut/6MCKfC4Kz sCMAn1f3lS1NRmQbkggjJMPWjdPP7CgU =Bn7v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OALPe59B06oQVFkAM2lf78sJBPQBviT5I--