From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [v10][PATCH 11/16] tools/libxl: detect and avoid conflicts with RDM
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 23:42:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55AE6871.6070903@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21934.24721.304399.773580@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
On 2015/7/21 23:09, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Chen, Tiejun writes ("Re: [v10][PATCH 11/16] tools/libxl: detect and avoid conflicts with RDM"):
>> +static void
>> +add_rdm_entry(libxl__gc *gc, libxl_domain_config *d_config,
>> + uint64_t rdm_start, uint64_t rdm_size, int rdm_policy)
>> +{
>> + d_config->num_rdms++;
>> + d_config->rdms = libxl__realloc(NOGC, d_config->rdms,
>> + d_config->num_rdms * sizeof(libxl_device_rdm));
>> +
>> + d_config->rdms[d_config->num_rdms - 1].start = rdm_start;
>> + d_config->rdms[d_config->num_rdms - 1].size = rdm_size;
>> + d_config->rdms[d_config->num_rdms - 1].policy = rdm_policy;
>> +}
>
>
> But, I wrote:
>
> Can I suggest a function
>
> void add_rdm_entry(libxl__gc *gc, libxl_domain_config *d_config,
> uint64_t rdm_start, uint64_t rdm_size, int rdm_policy)
>
> which assumes that d_config->num_rdms is set correctly, and increments
> it ?
>
> (Please put the increment at the end so that the assignments are to
> ->rdms[d_config->num_rdms], or perhaps make a convenience alias.)
>
> Note the last paragraph.
>
> This is now the third time I have posted that text. It is the fifth
> request or clarification I have had to make about this very small
> area. I have to say that I'm finding this rather frustrating.
Sorry, I just ignore the line in brackets since I always think this kind
of thing is often not a big deal, and next time I should pay more
attention to the (). But indeed, before I post this whole patch online I
also picked up this chunk of code to ask you to take a look that. This
manner means I'm not very sure if I'm addressing this properly. But I
didn't get a further response, so I guess that should work for you and
then I posted the whole online.
Now back on our problem,
static void
add_rdm_entry(libxl__gc *gc, libxl_domain_config *d_config,
uint64_t rdm_start, uint64_t rdm_size, int rdm_policy)
{
d_config->rdms = libxl__realloc(NOGC, d_config->rdms,
(d_config->num_rdms+1) * sizeof(libxl_device_rdm));
d_config->rdms[d_config->num_rdms].start = rdm_start;
d_config->rdms[d_config->num_rdms].size = rdm_size;
d_config->rdms[d_config->num_rdms].policy = rdm_policy;
d_config->num_rdms++;
}
Does this work for you? If I'm still wrong, please correct this function
directly to cost you less.
Thanks
Tiejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-21 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-20 6:16 [v10][PATCH 00/16] Fix RMRR Tiejun Chen
2015-07-20 6:16 ` [v10][PATCH 01/16] xen: introduce XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-07-20 6:16 ` [v10][PATCH 02/16] xen/vtd: create RMRR mapping Tiejun Chen
2015-07-20 6:16 ` [v10][PATCH 03/16] xen/passthrough: extend hypercall to support rdm reservation policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-20 6:16 ` [v10][PATCH 04/16] xen: enable XENMEM_memory_map in hvm Tiejun Chen
2015-07-20 6:16 ` [v10][PATCH 05/16] hvmloader: get guest memory map into memory_map[] Tiejun Chen
2015-07-20 6:16 ` [v10][PATCH 06/16] hvmloader/pci: Try to avoid placing BARs in RMRRs Tiejun Chen
2015-07-20 11:00 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-20 11:30 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-20 12:52 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-20 14:06 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-20 14:10 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-20 14:16 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-20 14:32 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-20 15:00 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-21 0:53 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-21 6:18 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-21 9:42 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-20 6:16 ` [v10][PATCH 07/16] hvmloader/e820: construct guest e820 table Tiejun Chen
2015-07-20 11:56 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-20 14:35 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-20 15:03 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-20 13:00 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-20 13:23 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-20 13:50 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-20 13:57 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-20 6:16 ` [v10][PATCH 08/16] tools/libxc: Expose new hypercall xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-07-20 6:16 ` [v10][PATCH 09/16] tools: extend xc_assign_device() to support rdm reservation policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-20 6:16 ` [v10][PATCH 10/16] tools: introduce some new parameters to set rdm policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-20 6:16 ` [v10][PATCH 11/16] tools/libxl: detect and avoid conflicts with RDM Tiejun Chen
2015-07-20 13:32 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-20 14:40 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-20 14:53 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-20 15:08 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-20 15:24 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-20 15:38 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-21 6:44 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-21 6:45 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-21 6:38 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-21 10:48 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-21 11:12 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-21 10:41 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-21 11:04 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-21 11:11 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-21 11:23 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-21 11:27 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-21 11:45 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-21 12:33 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-21 13:29 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-21 15:09 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-21 15:42 ` Chen, Tiejun [this message]
2015-07-21 15:57 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-21 15:57 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-22 0:33 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-22 8:43 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-22 9:18 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-22 10:28 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-22 10:51 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-21 13:41 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-21 15:10 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-21 15:22 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-21 15:31 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-21 12:04 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-21 12:34 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-20 6:16 ` [v10][PATCH 12/16] tools: introduce a new parameter to set a predefined rdm boundary Tiejun Chen
2015-07-20 6:17 ` [v10][PATCH 13/16] libxl: construct e820 map with RDM information for HVM guest Tiejun Chen
2015-07-20 13:34 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-20 6:17 ` [v10][PATCH 14/16] xen/vtd: enable USB device assignment Tiejun Chen
2015-07-20 6:17 ` [v10][PATCH 15/16] xen/vtd: prevent from assign the device with shared rmrr Tiejun Chen
2015-07-20 6:17 ` [v10][PATCH 16/16] tools: parse to enable new rdm policy parameters Tiejun Chen
2015-07-20 13:43 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-20 13:53 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-20 10:37 ` [v10][PATCH 00/16] Fix RMRR George Dunlap
2015-07-20 12:39 ` Chen, Tiejun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55AE6871.6070903@intel.com \
--to=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.